Hi!
We've been testing association with WPA APs. What follows are results on these
tests
with build 650. The reason we are using this build and not another (newer one)
is that
it's been shipped, so we will have a lot of feedback on it.
As everybody knows, out-of-the-box 650 will _not_ connect
Hi,
I've been working on trying to quantify the difference in WPA behavior
between 8.2.0 and 8.2.1. My test setup involves attempting to connect
to a WPA AP inside Sugar, performing suspend/resume, and trying again.
A success involves Sugar reporting "Connected", and a failure involves
Sugar aski
Hi All,
XO was Tested against WPA personal , and WPA2 personal with
Linksys wireless router.
Router : LinkSys WRT54G
Router Firmware Version:v8.00.0, Jan. 16, 2007
WPA Algorithms: AES
XO Build Version : OLPC Build 802 (stream 8.2.1;variant devel_jffs2)
Initial Test
Wireless with WPA P
On Dec 12, 2007 11:33 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 11:29 PM, Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We've been testing association with WPA APs. What follows are results on
> > these tests
> > with build 650. The reason we are using this
--- Original Message ---
From: "Marco Pesenti Gritti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ricardo Carrano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:33:09 +0100
Subject: Re: WPA -
On Dec 12, 2007 11:38 PM, Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco,
>
> Could you tell us, what is broken?
To make it short, wpa_passphrase is not executed correctly, so we
don't write a proper .cfg. The fix was available when Ship.2 was
released but we (me + Jim) decided to not land it
On Dec 12, 2007 11:29 PM, Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We've been testing association with WPA APs. What follows are results on
> these tests
> with build 650. The reason we are using this build and not another (newer
> one) is that
> it's been shipped, so we will have a l
Works for me on a Sitecom WL-174 WPA-PSK network. One of yesterdays
joyrides.
- Pascal.
>It's fixed yeah, that's why I'm asking to test it with a recent build.
>Ticket #5044. It went in joyride two weeks ago. It's reported working
>in both joyride and 657.
>
>Marco
>
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:10 +0100, Pascal Scheffers wrote:
> Works for me on a Sitecom WL-174 WPA-PSK network. One of yesterdays
> joyrides.
Works for me with 650 against a Linksys WRT54GC after disabling the
SIGCHLD handler in /usr/bin/sugar-shell.
I actually can't get it to fail, though I'm in
Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking
like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485.
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Michail,
We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build
today and get it out asap.
I had put the new firmware on that list to get into the new build, but
we really have to understand if this bug is real. If you and Ricardo
can look at this today (build is scheduled for 5pm), th
co Pesenti Gritti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
"Dan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ricardo Carrano"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Jim
Gettys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject
Re: WPA - testing
Michail,
We have two other c
icardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:36 -0500
Subject: Re: WPA - testing
> Michail,
> We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build
> today and get it out asap.
>
> I had put the new firmware on that
"Ricardo Carrano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2007
02:54:11 PM:
>
> - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed
> WPA support, I
> mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore.
>
Maybe something as simple as actually rebuilding wpa_supplicant?
nti Gritti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:54:11 -0300
Subject: Re: WPA - testing
> Ok
>
> - WPA works in 657 and in joyride 1407 in the whole stack (UI to firmware).
>
> - WPA support is broken in joyride 1416.
>
On Dec 13, 2007 9:50 PM, Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kim asked me to post this here.
> Here is the idea for today's build.
>
> Based on 650 +
> (1) whatever was fixed to make WPA work in UI
> (2) p47 libertas fw.
>
> Premises:
> - 657: Is not in good shape (confimed by Alex Latham)
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
>
>
> "Ricardo Carrano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2007
> 02:54:11 PM:
>
>
> >
> > - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed
> > WPA support, I
> > mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant
On Dec 13, 2007 10:24 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Ricardo Carrano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2007
> > 02:54:11 PM:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really cra
md5sum for the supplicant haven't changed.
-- Original Message ---
From: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michail Bletsas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:24:14 -0500
Subject: Re:
Interesting. Thanks.
I'm currently using build-34. I think I've tried 800, 801, and a few other
build-3? without noticing any differences. (But I didn't look as carefully
with the others.) I'm not sure how they relate to Sugar 8.2.0 or 8.2.1.
I'm seeing a different pattern, perhaps because
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> I've been working on trying to quantify the difference in WPA behavior
> between 8.2.0 and 8.2.1.
> (...)
>
> Failures leave the string "Activation (eth0/wireless): disconnected
> during association, asking for new key" in /var/log/mes
2009/3/2 Javier Cardona :
> Agreed. However, I believe you can claim reliable WPA2 support, as
> the WPA2 handshake doesn't have this timing vulnerability.
> Have not tested extensively, but my experience was that WPA2 was very
> reliable.
Yes, my experience is also that WPA2 is more reliable. H
>> Agreed. However, I believe you can claim reliable WPA2 support, as
>> the WPA2 handshake doesn't have this timing vulnerability.
>> Have not tested extensively, but my experience was that WPA2 was very
>> reliable.
>
> Yes, my experience is also that WPA2 is more reliable. However, don't
> for
Hi Peter,
> On my XO that's currently running 8.2.0 on the nand I can reliably
> connect to my home AP which is explicitly configured for WAP (due
> to issues with dodgy wifi drivers on my eeepc not working with it
> when WPA2 is enabled) but can't connect to the Cisco AP in the
> o
2009/3/2 Javier Cardona :
> I would suggest to compare the two versions with different AP models.
> For instance, with the D-Link WBR-2310 you will see a huge improvement
> when using 8.2.1.
Have you tested this using an actual present-day OS 8.2.1 build, or
just using your custom kernel during th
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2009/3/2 Javier Cardona :
>> I would suggest to compare the two versions with different AP models.
>> For instance, with the D-Link WBR-2310 you will see a huge improvement
>> when using 8.2.1.
>
> Have you tested this using an actual present-
> Yes, my experience is also that WPA2 is more reliable. However, don't
> forget that 8.2.1 introduces another regression which I can reproduce
> every time where the WPA2 (and WPA) connection is not automatically
> reestablished on reboot - association and WPA2 handshake succeeds, but
> the syste
Javier Cardona wrote:
> In addition to this, there are two important wireless fixes in 8.2.1:
> #7825 and #9048. The first one is a failure to associate to "fast"
> Access Points when WPA is enabled.
#7825 wasn't mentioned in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/8.2.1#Bug_fixes , I added it.
rasika.karunathil...@gmail.com said:
> XO was Tested against WPA personal , and WPA2 personal with Linksys
> wireless router.
> Router : LinkSys WRT54G Router Firmware Version:v8.00.0, Jan.
> 16, 2007 WPA Algorithms: AES XO Build Version : OLPC Build 802
> (stream 8.2.1;variant devel_
> rasika.karunathil...@gmail.com said:
>> XO was Tested against WPA personal , and WPA2 personal with Linksys
>> wireless router.
>
>> Router : LinkSys WRT54G Router Firmware Version: v8.00.0, Jan.
>> 16, 2007 WPA Algorithms: AES XO Build Version : OLPC Build 802
>> (stream 8.2.1;variant
Hi all,
I've updated to 8.2.1 just now and am not able to connect to my WPA/WPA2 AP.
I'm using a configuration file for wpa_supplicant and launching it
separately, since I use an hidden SSID.
I connect to the network in WPA2 mode, with AES.
>From what the debug output of wpa_supplicant tells me,
31 matches
Mail list logo
