Holger Levsen wrote:
> for Debian I've started http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/OLPC/ToDo yesterday,
> to document what is working and whats not and what work needs to be done.
>
> In general, a document describing how the XO-1-fedora installation differs
> from a plain fedora would be very muc
Hi,
for Debian I've started http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/OLPC/ToDo yesterday,
to document what is working and whats not and what work needs to be done.
In general, a document describing how the XO-1-fedora installation differs
from a plain fedora would be very much appreciated, also by the
Hi,
evince-olpc is deprecated. The new package that should be used with Read
is sugar-evince.
Reinier
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> *In general* packages have 'olpc' in their titles because they are not
> appropriate for non-XO machines. There are exceptions: olpc-contents
> and olpc-evince (or is
*In general* packages have 'olpc' in their titles because they are not
appropriate for non-XO machines. There are exceptions: olpc-contents
and olpc-evince (or is it called evince-sugar?) come to mind.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
__
Michael Stone wrote:
> Jani,
>
> Adapting Rainbow (the activity isolation component) to work on regular
> linux systems is an interesting challenge that I'd love to discuss with
> you.
Unless Rainbow is necessary for parts of the Sugar emulation to work
correctly - minus security - it is not a p
Jani,
Adapting Rainbow (the activity isolation component) to work on regular
linux systems is an interesting challenge that I'd love to discuss with
you.
At present, there are three or so issues that would need to be overcome:
First, magic numbers. The rainbow codebase hardcodes some magic
n
Hello,
which software besides Sugar and the activities are XO independent and
would make sense to be packaged and run in emulators or normal PCs?
I see there are various projects with olpc in their name - olpc-utils,
olpc-content, then there's the security infrastructure.
I'd appreciate any sugge
