I've received a donation of a 11.6" Pinebook Linux Laptop from the
PINE64 Community.
This sub-$100 laptop performs nicely for the price.
It can be charged over USB.
The laptop came with Ubuntu 18.04 and KDE Neon. A very functional
desktop environment.
Sugar 0.117 can be used. The
he identity key, and how is it deleted?
A cryptographic identitifier of the Sugar user, randomly created at
first boot and stored in files;
.sugar/default/owner.key and
.sugar/default/owner.key.pub
Delete it using rm, as it says here;
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Imaging/Side_effects
"Otherwise the
he identity key, and how is it deleted?
A cryptographic identitifier of the Sugar user, randomly created at
first boot and stored in files;
.sugar/default/owner.key and
.sugar/default/owner.key.pub
Delete it using rm, as it says here;
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Imaging/Side_effects
"Otherwise the
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:17 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> without deleting the identity
> key the activity collaboration feature will fail in strange ways.
>
What's the identity key, and how is it deleted?
___
Devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:17 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> without deleting the identity
> key the activity collaboration feature will fail in strange ways.
>
What's the identity key, and how is it deleted?
___
Server-devel mailing list
PM, Adam Holt <[1]h...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <[2]tony_ander...@usa.net>
> wrote:
>
> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
> remove the Journal because
PM, Adam Holt <[1]h...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <[2]tony_ander...@usa.net>
> wrote:
>
> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
> remove the Journal because
OLPC OS on the XO is configured for ownership style "one laptop per
child".
If you always want to delete the child's Sugar name, you might either
change login scripts to delete it before starting, or assume a
default. It simplifies getting started into a class.
e.g. in the OLPC OS
OLPC OS on the XO is configured for ownership style "one laptop per
child".
If you always want to delete the child's Sugar name, you might either
change login scripts to delete it before starting, or assume a
default. It simplifies getting started into a class.
e.g. in the OLPC OS
Your bundle does not meet the requirements.
I've downloaded it, and sugar-install-bundle says what is wrong;
sugar3.bundle.bundle.MalformedBundleException: All files in the bundle
must be inside a single directory whose name ends with '.activity'
Sure enough, "unzip -l" shows the dire
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
> wrote:
>
>> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
>> remove the Journal because of space
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
> wrote:
>
>> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
>> remove the Journal because of space
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
wrote:
> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
> remove the Journal because of space considerations, 'rm -rf
> /home/olpc/sugar/datastore' is sufficient. After this comma
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
wrote:
> A teacher should never 'rm -rf /home/olpc/.sugar'. If the intent is to
> remove the Journal because of space considerations, 'rm -rf
> /home/olpc/sugar/datastore' is sufficient. After this comma
Clicking on http://download.unleashkids.org/HaitiOS/bundles/livreshaiti.xol
works in Sugar's Browse activity on OLPC OS 13.2.9, correctly loading books
into Sugar.
However doing the same thing from the command-line ("sugar-install-bundle
livreshaiti.xol") does not work :/
Does anyon
s in the main folder, it is shown instead of the list. The url of an
> XO is shown in the frame. This can be used by other xo on that network
> using Browse. Enter: http://192.168.1.11:8008 where 8008 is the
> SimpleHTMLServer port.
>
> Currently Sugar provides /home/olpc/Library as the
s in the main folder, it is shown instead of the list. The url of an
> XO is shown in the frame. This can be used by other xo on that network
> using Browse. Enter: http://192.168.1.11:8008 where 8008 is the
> SimpleHTMLServer port.
>
> Currently Sugar provides /home/olpc/Library as the
path/test.pdf, check if that works first. You might just be
able to have the .xol's index.html contain the file://path as a point to
the pdf file.
Hope that helps.
"
Presumably by then installing the .xol in Sugar -> Terminal Activity as
> follows?
>
>sugar-install-bundle /run/med
Is building an .xol bundle/collection/file (containing all the PDF's) the
easiest way? What's the easiest way to build up an .xol of PDF's if so?
Presumably by then installing the .xol in Sugar -> Terminal Activity as
follows?
sugar-install-bundle /run/media/olpc//
Or is there much bet
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.9 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 18, with updated activities Browse-157.4,
Calculate-44, Chat-84, Clock-19, GetBooks-17, Help-20.1,
ImageViewer-63, Implode-18, Jukebox-33, Log-38, Maze-27, Memorize-53
ionel,
>>>>>
>>>>> Congrats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quick question: What is the procedure for an app developer to get a
>>>>> new version into your distro? Turtle Blocks has made many advances since
>>>>> the version you p
> *From:* IAEP <iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org> on behalf of Samson Goddy
> <samsongo...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 7, 2017 10:24:33 AM
> *To:* Steve Thomas
> *Cc:* iaep; OLPC Devel; Sugar-dev Devel; unleashk...@googlegroups.com;
> Lion
t; Lionel,
>>>>
>>>> Congrats.
>>>>
>>>> Quick question: What is the procedure for an app developer to get a new
>>>> version into your distro? Turtle Blocks has made many advances since the
>>>> version you package.
>>>
n 6, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm proud to announce the eighth version (0.8) of Sugarizer, a taste of
>> Sugar for any device.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://
gt;
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I'm proud to announce the eighth version (0.8) of Sugarizer, a taste of
> Sugar for any device.
>
>
>
> http://sugarizer.org
>
>
>
> Main features in this new version:
>
>- Speak activity: The famous Sugar Speak activity:
On the 6th of January 2017 at 09:02, Lionel Laské wrote:
Hi all,
I'm proud to announce the eighth version (0.8) of Sugarizer, a taste
of Sugar for any device.
Yo
[...]
New in Sugarizer 0.8 for Android is "Sugarizer OS". Sugarizer OS is a
way to use Sugarizer as your Androi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:20:54PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote:
> Thanks for the release. It is much appreciated. So far, I’ve flashed
> it just fine on several production XO-1’s I have, both on the
> internal NAND as well as to a 32GB Samsung (Class 6) SD card,
> however in the case of the SD card
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.8 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.110 on Fedora 18, with updated activities Speak-52,
Measure-53, Maze-26.1, Implode-17, GetBooks-16.2, Clock-18.1, and
Chat-83.
Details of new features, fixes, known issues, and how
Thanks Anish :)
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
I cannot say about SL membership but the XSCE does certainly cater to
non-sugar audiences. Most of the XSCE deployments in India I know of are
non sugar based. That said, a lot of XSCE deployments also use sugar and
olpc laptops. Recent builds of XSCE also contain sugarizer, and the
software
Hi
In http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg17326.html Caryl
Bigenho <ca...@laptop.org> asked me to ask you all if you consider XSCE a
Sugar Labs project.
I'm assuming the answer is "no" but I was asked to confirm :)
As a follow up question, is anyone cont
Problem 1:
Sugar now has a "register again" which I have only used to connect to the
same server. I guess that it's hard to do a ssh connection to a different
server (same IP) without ssh complaining about a possible man in the middle
attack. This is the situation describe
w section? The Network section has become
>>>> cluttered with radio device controls, access point cache control,
>>>> jabber server, social help, and soon proxy settings.)
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't the backup related fields be more relevant in the backu
mes & the Sugar 0.108 Team!!
>
> Aside: i haven't given up (yet) on a wider array of quality learning videos
> (from Internet-in-a-Box 2.0 etc) becoming playable on XO-1 in 2016 so many
> years later. Issues you've well-documented @ [1]http://wiki.laptop.org/go/
> Release_notes
Tremendous news, Profound thanks James & the Sugar 0.108 Team!!
Aside: i haven't given up (yet) on a wider array of quality learning videos
(from Internet-in-a-Box 2.0 etc) becoming playable on XO-1 in 2016 so many
years later. Issues you've well-documented @
http://wiki.laptop.or
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.7 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.108 on Fedora 18, with a few activities upgraded.
Details of new features, fixes, known issues, and how to download,
install or upgrade can be found in the release notes
GREAT :)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Tim Moody <t...@timmoody.com> wrote:
> congratulations.
>
>
>
> *From:* unleashk...@googlegroups.com [mailto:unleashk...@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Lionel Laské
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:07 AM
> *
Very encouraging to see Sugaristas' Long Term Support discussions of any
kind: how to innovate sustaining old hardware with new software, how to
balance hacker contributors' critical motivations with 3rd world educators'
excruciating economics, how to think about Server-Sugar interactions
evolving
Congrats to Sameer for taking Sugar Lab's future very seriously!
Those who consider Sugarizer.org to be part of that future, please join us
live with its founder Lionel Laske 9:30AM NYC Time Wedn to explore such
possibilities, alongside possible integration with School Server / XSCE
6.1
Please forward below, to others who have a stake in the future of Sugar -
All those active with Sugar (on XO's, with http://Sugarizer.org, or
otherwise) should bring their deployment/implementation/community insights
to the table, taking the choices we face in our 2nd decade of OLPC/Sugar
very
ild first as an intermediate step?
> >
> > Caryl
> > PS I don't know which build since I'm no
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 4:57 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > G'day,
> > >
>
t; >
> > > Caryl
> > > PS I don't know which build since I'm no
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 4:57 PM, James Cameron <[8]qu...@laptop.org>
wrote:
> > > >
&g
u...@laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > G'day,
> > >
> > > We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.6 for XO-1,
> > > XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
> > >
> > > It is Sugar 0.107 on Fedora 18, with a fe
> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 4:57 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > G'day,
> >
> > We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.6 for XO-1,
> > XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
> >
> > It is Sugar 0.107 on Fedora 18, with
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.6 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.107 on Fedora 18, with a few activities upgraded.
Details of new features, fixes, known issues, and how to download,
install or upgrade can be found in the release notes
On Sep 28, 2015 6:00 AM, "James Cameron" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:59:38PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
> > But I finally got it! WiFi password was ALSO cached in:
> >
> >/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/keys-WAN
>
> You're not using an OLPC build, the latest is based
hing much later than Fedora 18. Care to share?
There are probably others who may benefit from a working build more
recent than Fedora 18.
(After Fedora 18, Network Manager was changed to store connections
differently.)
So your question wasn't really anything to do with Sugar, in the end,
since S
hing much later than Fedora 18. Care to share?
There are probably others who may benefit from a working build more
recent than Fedora 18.
(After Fedora 18, Network Manager was changed to store connections
differently.)
So your question wasn't really anything to do with Sugar, in the end,
since S
On Sep 28, 2015 6:00 AM, "James Cameron" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:59:38PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
> > But I finally got it! WiFi password was ALSO cached in:
> >
> >/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/keys-WAN
>
> You're not using an OLPC build, the latest is based
adam wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/
that's is where the config lives on the machine i'm looking
at (running 13.2.0).
try:
cd /etc
sudo grep -R .
cd /home/olpc
sudo grep -R .
on older releases, sugar ke
adam wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/
that's is where the config lives on the machine i'm looking
at (running 13.2.0).
try:
cd /etc
sudo grep -R .
cd /home/olpc
sudo grep -R .
on older releases, sugar ke
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote:
> adam wrote:
> > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully delete a
> WiFi
> > credential, even after reboot of the XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.106.0, the
> > password is cl
, 2015 at 12:06 PM Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > adam wrote:
> > > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully delete a
> > > WiFi
> > > credential, even after reboot of the XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.106
e:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On September 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > adam wrote:
>> > > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully
delete a
>> > > WiFi
e:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On September 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > adam wrote:
>> > > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully
delete a
>> > > WiFi
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Kurt H Maier <k...@sciops.net> wrote:
> So, it's not in the gnome keyring. is it in
> /home/olpc/.sugar/default/nm/networks.cfg ?
>
Nothing obvious in /home/olpc/.sugar/default and no nm within
/home/olpc/.sugar/default on this XO-1.5. In fact
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Kurt H Maier <k...@sciops.net> wrote:
> So, it's not in the gnome keyring. is it in
> /home/olpc/.sugar/default/nm/networks.cfg ?
>
Nothing obvious in /home/olpc/.sugar/default and no nm within
/home/olpc/.sugar/default on this XO-1.5. In fact
ry! Somewhere in the bowels of Fedora presumably? To
> triple-check all assumptions, I've rebooted many times and the
> very-much-passworded WiFi auto-connects every time. (Auto-connected from
> Sugar anyway, though not auto-connecting from Gnome seemingl, when I tried
> rebooting fr
ry! Somewhere in the bowels of Fedora presumably? To
> triple-check all assumptions, I've rebooted many times and the
> very-much-passworded WiFi auto-connects every time. (Auto-connected from
> Sugar anyway, though not auto-connecting from Gnome seemingl, when I tried
> rebooting fr
adam wrote:
> "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully delete a WiFi
> credential, even after reboot of the XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.106.0, the
> password is clearly still buried+working in the system somewhere.
under sugar, i think it's in the control panel, u
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote:
> adam wrote:
> > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully delete a
> WiFi
> > credential, even after reboot of the XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.106.0, the
> > password is cl
Great!
Congratulations to all!
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:56 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.5 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.106 on Fedora 18, with Social Help, new activities, and
improved display
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 04:17:55PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/official/13.2.5-17/fs2.zip is
404
Thanks. Fixed. Was a missing symbolic link.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing
http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/official/13.2.5-17/fs2.zip is 404
Tom Gilliard
On 07/09/2015 02:56 PM, James Cameron wrote:
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.5 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.106 on Fedora 18, with Social Help, new
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.5 for XO-1,
XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4.
It is Sugar 0.106 on Fedora 18, with Social Help, new activities, and
improved display controls in the frame.
Details of new features, known issues, and how to download, install or
upgrade can
Thanks, I've pushed this to the v7.0 branch on olpc-os-builder.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Nice!!!
-walter
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:35 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
G'day,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.2.4 for XO-1.
It is Sugar 0.104 on Fedora 18, with a fix to using Browse with Google
Search.
To install on XO-1:
http
There are at least two types of deployments/customers that Sugar has.
The first is the small, volunteer group. To them, it doesn't matter what
OS they actually are using, or (to some extent) how well tested things
are. They just want to come in, try something with their students
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org
wrote:
The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want
to deploy
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:49 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:28:42AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
When I talked with deployments and they ask for Ubuntu,
and I ask why, what they really want is Long Time Support.
No deployment change their image more
, myself and others put in a lot of effort back in the
F-14/15 days to get everything upstream into Fedora. I continue to
maintain that and produce a Sugar on a Stick release with every Fedora
release.
In the last release Daniel and I was involved in the delta between
Fedora and the OLPC release
and internally-driven priorities.
Have no paid devops staff or worldwide priority list? You need to be on Fedora
or *never* ever change.
SugarLabs being in that place, with people like you to take forward Sugar
packages on the popular, RHEL-upstream (in practice) Fedora, there is no good
reason
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote:
The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy
your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all of
them to have the same configuration.
From my memory of
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:59:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Has anyone actually booted the latest Ubuntu LTS on any/all the XOs?
I've tried it on XO-1.5, and it was doable, but lots of missing
things. My estimate to fix is greater than the size of work to
stabilise Fedora 20 or Fedora 22.
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:28:42AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
When I talked with deployments and they ask for Ubuntu,
and I ask why, what they really want is Long Time Support.
No deployment change their image more than once a year.
In fact, change a image is a logistic challenge for most of
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:21:35PM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
OLPC already appears to be going the Ubuntu LTS route
When/where can I read more about what OLPC is doing with Ubuntu LTS? Apologies
for the lazyweb request.
Martin
pgpmmvPQ1vjFZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-14/15 days to get everything upstream into Fedora. I continue to
maintain that and produce a Sugar on a Stick release with every Fedora
release.
In the last release Daniel and I was involved in the delta between
Fedora and the OLPC release was very minimal. Basically kernel,
firmware, and some
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote:
The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want
to deploy your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO
laptops, allowing all
;
1. our installed base express interest in Fedora or Ubuntu,
Daniel Drake, myself and others put in a lot of effort back in the
F-14/15 days to get everything upstream into Fedora. I continue to
maintain that and produce a Sugar on a Stick release with every Fedora
release.
Agreed, and my
No official announcements yet.
Samuel was looking at the bug database,
because he knows where to look :)
Gonzalo
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:21:35PM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
OLPC already appears to be going
and kept us involved to resist changes that cause damage.
We were there once. It required a low but continuous engineering
effort.
It use to take around an hour to cut a release from Fedora/Sugar
repos. Quite often the delta from a patch for a fix being created and
a new OS was in the hours
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:56:32AM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
On 06/05/15 18:10, James Cameron wrote:
1. our installed base express interest in Fedora or Ubuntu,
I wonder how accurate this is?
No idea.
Many times upstream, or suppliers, tend to lump entire deployments
into one
Hi Sam,
- Who actually is using/testing these images?
I downloaded it (XO-1 and XO-4 versions).
- Why?
To test if all is working in a new Fedora, and to try find a solution
for the Browse problems in the XO-1. Sadly wifi connectivity
is not working ok in the F20 images.
- Is
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I think we should try make a build using CentOS. I don't know if
have all the packages we need, but the rate of change in Fedora was
difficult to follow when OLPC had a team dedicated and now is almost
impossible. The true is we
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:49:47AM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
They all seem to want a better browser and better codec support to
view various+sundry videos, within Sugar ideally, but if that's not
possible then within Gnome. One group per week asks me for the
above, above all else (often more
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:29:46PM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
It might be possible for this new builder to be eventually taught to
handle XOs.
There was no significant interest in my previous builder uxo, which
already knows how to handle XOs. The recent posts on devel@ of people
trying
The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy
your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all
of them to have the same configuration.
There's plenty of blame to go around in terms of re-inventing the wheel and
lack of communication.
There
images more widely available.
4. Personally I would argue that a CentOS or another long-term build may
be the best approach for XOs. Sugar is in EPEL 6, and likely could be
added to EPEL 7.
It should surprise no one at this point that the list of personnel on
OLPC's web site is years
. And if it is required, the same set of
Sugar activities or the same user level desktop will suffice. The
software layers are well isolated; there's no reason to have the same
things all the way down to the kernel.
Since OLPC already appears to be going the Ubuntu LTS route, I would
argue it would
On 06/05/15 18:10, James Cameron wrote:
1. our installed base express interest in Fedora or Ubuntu,
I wonder how accurate this is?
Many times upstream, or suppliers, tend to lump entire deployments
into one person or group.
Did you mean administrators, technicians, teachers, or users?
--
is using/testing these images?
Not me, yet.
* Why?
I maintained in the past official images for Peru.
* Is there a reason you are not looking into using an official (OLPC
or deployment) build?
Yes we like to roll our own to include native languages, features (e.g.
Sugar Network), etc
progress might be possible on various XO
laptops?
Very wishful, most of the server stuff would already be in
CentOS/EPEL, to get the the sugar stack and dependencies in would be a
reasonable chunk of work. The standard packages in Fedora could easily
be branched for EPEL7 and would all be compatible
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org
wrote:
At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org
wrote:
At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out:
- olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org
wrote:
Are we planning to do anything with Sugar at the Fedora Flock Conference
(August 12-15, Rochester NY - www.flocktofedora.org) this year?
The call for talks just ended although it might be possible to sneak one
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:56:22AM +, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
James wrote:
To check, make sure the laptop is unlocked, and add this to the
second line of the boot/olpc.fth file:
dev /sd patch 2drop cb! sdhci-card-power-off dend
Does this keep the SD slot powered only
To check, make sure the laptop is unlocked, and add this to the second
line of the boot/olpc.fth file:
dev /sd patch 2drop cb! sdhci-card-power-off dend
Does this keep the SD slot powered only when is occupied or regardless?
Does the OS takes over the SD slot power management
, devel@lists.laptop.org,
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash
Message-ID: 20150408034727.gi9...@us.netrek.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Browse is one of the most heavily used activities when internet
question is ... when is it that the XO-1 will both read from
NAND flash _and_ from SD card at the same time? Probably never.
Data that moves from NAND flash to memory happens during Sugar
startup, and the first time an activity is started. It can also
happen if a different activity is started
Perhaps silly Q...
Any benefit just putting swap and static content on the SD?
Kg
Sent from my currently functioning gadget
Original Message
From: James Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 19:31
To: devel@lists.laptop.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
support-g...@lists.laptop.org
1 - 100 of 3789 matches
Mail list logo