Regarding _using_ the 'new' toolbar:
> I would argue your 'significant amount of XO screen real estate' is a
> rather large exaggeration ;-)
My XO-1 screen is 4.5 inches vertically. On soas70xo, two toolbars
together visually "black out" .75 inches vertically. That's 1/6 of
my entire screen.
>> The "X crash" scrolling problem is a BLOCKER
>
> I know, you heard it here first. Care to bugzilla it?
>
>> 'rpm -q kernel' attests to sloppy composing of the build.
>
> Sloppy is hardly the moniker for the general practice of having two
> kernels installed (one backup/running and one to-be-boo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:14:34AM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> The "X crash" scrolling problem is a BLOCKER
I know, you heard it here first. Care to bugzilla it?
> 'rpm -q kernel' attests to sloppy composing of the build.
Sloppy is hardly the moniker for the general practice of having two
k
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Mikus,
>
> On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:14, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>
>> With now more exposure to it, I still do not like the new toolbar
>> design. The XO has a *small* display screen. Now many Activity
>> capabilities (such as 'Edit' in Termi
Disclaimer: I am not asking for help; I'm sharing my experiences.
Ran with soas70xo (booted from nand) on my XO-1. Many of the
difficulties with previous SoaS builds were still present, with some
new ones added.
The "X crash" scrolling problem is a BLOCKER - for instance, because
of this pr
