martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Richard A. Smith
> wrote:
> > How are you determining in olpc-utils that you are running on a 1.75?
> > Is this available for runin to pickup?
>
> +# FIXME XO-1.75 fallback support until we get ofw data
> +# exposed via dev
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> How are you determining in olpc-utils that you are running on a 1.75?
> Is this available for runin to pickup?
+# FIXME XO-1.75 fallback support until we get ofw data
+# exposed via device tree
+elif [ `uname -m`
On 06/25/2011 11:00 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Thanks for sharing it. I agree with developing it as a scratch branch,
> while temporary hacks are needed and it targets F13 instead of F14.
>
> Looking at what is there already, I'm hopeful that you will soon have
> device tree access working (this is
On 23 June 2011 17:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Unless there's concerns with this, I'm planning to use this branch as
> a bit of a scratch branch for xo-1.75 support patches, so it's visible
> to you and others hacking on olpc-utils, and can be merged or reworked
> as appropriate.
Thanks for shar
I've pushed out a patch with initial support for xo-1.75 -- it's on an
'xo-1.75' branch, if you think it passes review, perhaps worthy of a
merge.
Unless there's concerns with this, I'm planning to use this branch as
a bit of a scratch branch for xo-1.75 support patches, so it's visible
to you and
