---
docs/about/removed-features.rst | 9 +
qapi/machine.json | 28
hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c| 8
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 11 +--
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
For spapr:
Reviewed-by: Har
On 1/17/24 19:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
For consistency we should drop the names with a "+" in it in the
long run.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/
a hack in type_name_is_valid() to still allow them for
compatibility reasons. However, there is a much nicer solution for this:
Simply use aliases! This way we can still support the old names without
the need for the ugly hack in type_name_is_valid().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Reviewe
On 1/12/24 10:42, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 12/01/2024 05.57, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
On 1/11/24 22:16, Thomas Huth wrote:
The character "+" is now forbidden in QOM device names (see commit
b447378e1217 - "Limit type names to alphanumerical and some few special
characters&quo
TYPE("power5+_v2.1"),
+DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power5plus_v2.1"),
DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power7_v2.3"),
-DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power7+_v2.1"),
+DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power7plus_v2.1"),
Will using Power5x, Power7x be a
