On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:57 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> machine
>
> This effec
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 18:06:56 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> machine
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:4
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:49:40AM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > I'm failing to see what real world technical problems QEMU faces
> > with a parameter being set to '1' by a mgmt app, when QEMU itself
> > treats all omitted values as being '1' anyway.
> >
> > If we're trying to faithfully model the re
> I'm failing to see what real world technical problems QEMU faces
> with a parameter being set to '1' by a mgmt app, when QEMU itself
> treats all omitted values as being '1' anyway.
>
> If we're trying to faithfully model the real world, then restricting
> the topology against machine types thou
t; > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> > machine
> >
> > This effectively reverts
> >
> > commit 54c4ea8f3ae614054079395842128a856a73dbf9
> > Author: Zhao Liu
> > Date: Sat Mar 9 00:01:37 2024 +0800
> >
Cc Paolo for x86 topology part
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:57 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> machine
>
&
This effectively reverts
commit 54c4ea8f3ae614054079395842128a856a73dbf9
Author: Zhao Liu
Date: Sat Mar 9 00:01:37 2024 +0800
hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" SMP configurations
but is not done as a 'git revert' since the part of the changes to the
file hw/co
