Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Recommend virtio instead of virtio-(non-)transitional

2024-11-12 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 09:12:06AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > +Virtio device models > > > + > > > + > > > +Virtio devices come in several variants, some of which are only > > > applicable to > > >

Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Recommend virtio instead of virtio-(non-)transitional

2024-11-12 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:34:49PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > When virtio-(non-)transitional models were introduced, the > > documentation was updated to include them; at the same time, > > language was introduced indicati

Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Recommend virtio instead of virtio-(non-)transitional

2024-11-11 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:34:49PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > When virtio-(non-)transitional models were introduced, the > > documentation was updated to include them; at the same time, > > language was introduced indicati

Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Recommend virtio instead of virtio-(non-)transitional

2024-11-11 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:34:49PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: When virtio-(non-)transitional models were introduced, the documentation was updated to include them; at the same time, language was introduced indicating that using the existing virtio model is no longer recommended. This is unne

[PATCH v2] docs: Recommend virtio instead of virtio-(non-)transitional

2024-11-07 Thread Andrea Bolognani
When virtio-(non-)transitional models were introduced, the documentation was updated to include them; at the same time, language was introduced indicating that using the existing virtio model is no longer recommended. This is unnecessarily harsh, and has resulted in people incorrectly believing (t