On 2009/09/07, at 7:32, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
> How's it going with the 2.6.31 kernel?
There are a lot of changes in include files.
I have to write many patch files.
I am writing include files about SystemAce.
I think it works with the kernel 2.6.23.
Takeshi
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Democompo
Date: Sunday 06 September 2009
From: lementec fabien
To: Sébastien Bourdeauducq
Hi,
just to inform you I pushed the code in the git repository
(attic/modsynth-linux). Dont know what you we can do
with that, and I will try to mak
On Sunday 06 September 2009 16:47:57 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote:
> Boot log is below.
Cool :)
How's it going with the 2.6.31 kernel?
Sébastien
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.milkymist.org
http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org
FWIW we have been using the lm32 patches against
4.3 and 4.4 and providing them with the RTEMS
tool RPMs. We would also appreciate these
getting reviewed and merged.
Thanks.
--joel
sebastien.bourdeaud...@lekernel.net wrote:
Hi,
Would you mind including support for the LatticeMico32 soft p
Hi,
On 2009/09/06, at 22:51, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
>> 1. We do not support ECP250.
>> 2. We support ECP250.
>>However, we do not guarantee its working.
>
> I would suggest choice 1 in order to avoid feature creep, and
because we do
> not have a board to test it so that feature will
Hi,
On Sunday 06 September 2009 15:45:59 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote:
> I think we have two choices.
>
> 1. We do not support ECP250.
>
> 2. We support ECP250.
> However, we do not guarantee its working.
I would suggest choice 1 in order to avoid feature creep, and because we do
not have a board t
Hi,
On 2009/09/06, at 21:41, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
> Maybe we should also remove all support for the ECP250 board as well?
I am going to support ECP250 board (only UART) after Kernel 2.6.31
works.
> As we do not have such a board, we cannot reasonably push a patch
supporting it (n
On Sunday 06 September 2009 14:06:32 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote:
> It's done. :)
Thanks :)
Maybe we should also remove all support for the ECP250 board as well? As we do
not have such a board, we cannot reasonably push a patch supporting it (no
testing possible) and ensuring maintainability.
Sébast
On 2009/09/06, at 20:29, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
Hi Takeshi,
I've seen that you have included a board configuration option for the
Spartan-3A evaluation kit support in Linux.
This board is not capable of running Linux because it lacks a
sufficient amount
of memory, so this option is
Hi,
Would you mind including support for the LatticeMico32 soft processor in
the upcoming GCC 4.5 series?
We at Milkymist [1] develop a free system-on-chip design [2] that uses the
Mico32 processor and having out-of-the box Mico32 support in GCC would help
software development on this free SoC p
Hi Takeshi,
I've seen that you have included a board configuration option for the
Spartan-3A evaluation kit support in Linux.
This board is not capable of running Linux because it lacks a sufficient amount
of memory, so this option is not relevant.
However, I'm working on a dedicated Milkymist
11 matches
Mail list logo
