Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Takeshi MATSUYA
On 2009/09/07, at 7:32, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: > How's it going with the 2.6.31 kernel? There are a lot of changes in include files. I have to write many patch files. I am writing include files about SystemAce. I think it works with the kernel 2.6.23. Takeshi

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
On Sunday 06 September 2009 16:47:57 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote: > Boot log is below. Cool :) How's it going with the 2.6.31 kernel? Sébastien ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.milkymist.org http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Takeshi MATSUYA
Hi, On 2009/09/06, at 22:51, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: >> 1. We do not support ECP250. >> 2. We support ECP250. >>However, we do not guarantee its working. > > I would suggest choice 1 in order to avoid feature creep, and because we do > not have a board to test it so that feature will

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
Hi, On Sunday 06 September 2009 15:45:59 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote: > I think we have two choices. > > 1. We do not support ECP250. > > 2. We support ECP250. > However, we do not guarantee its working. I would suggest choice 1 in order to avoid feature creep, and because we do not have a board t

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Takeshi MATSUYA
Hi, On 2009/09/06, at 21:41, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: > Maybe we should also remove all support for the ECP250 board as well? I am going to support ECP250 board (only UART) after Kernel 2.6.31 works. > As we do not have such a board, we cannot reasonably push a patch supporting it (n

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
On Sunday 06 September 2009 14:06:32 Takeshi MATSUYA wrote: > It's done. :) Thanks :) Maybe we should also remove all support for the ECP250 board as well? As we do not have such a board, we cannot reasonably push a patch supporting it (no testing possible) and ensuring maintainability. Sébast

Re: [Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Takeshi MATSUYA
On 2009/09/06, at 20:29, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: Hi Takeshi, I've seen that you have included a board configuration option for the Spartan-3A evaluation kit support in Linux. This board is not capable of running Linux because it lacks a sufficient amount of memory, so this option is

[Milkymist-devel] Linux boards

2009-09-06 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
Hi Takeshi, I've seen that you have included a board configuration option for the Spartan-3A evaluation kit support in Linux. This board is not capable of running Linux because it lacks a sufficient amount of memory, so this option is not relevant. However, I'm working on a dedicated Milkymist