Is this what Tim Prins was working on?
On Aug 16, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Tim S. Woodall wrote:
I'm not sure why this is even building... Is someone working on this?
I thought we had .ompi_ignore files in this directory.
Tim
Nathan DeBardeleben wrote:
So I'm seeing all these nice emails about pe
I'm not sure why this is even building... Is someone working on this?
I thought we had .ompi_ignore files in this directory.
Tim
Nathan DeBardeleben wrote:
So I'm seeing all these nice emails about people developing on OMPI
today yet I can't get it to compile. Am I out here in limbo on this o
So I'm seeing all these nice emails about people developing on OMPI
today yet I can't get it to compile. Am I out here in limbo on this or
are others in the same boat? The errors I'm seeing are about some bproc
code calling undefined functions and they are linked again below.
-- Nathan
Corre
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:47:52AM -0600, Tim S. Woodall wrote:
> We're working on an approach to this now, that I think will address what
> you are looking for. Will let you know when we have something a little more
> concrete.
>
I have the initial code that does what I've described. Do you want
No, I lied. The IU CS department is having issues with the LDAP
server, and it's causing all kinds of secondary effects. SVN may be
touch-and-go until they get this fixed.
On Aug 16, 2005, at 3:29 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Seems to be all better now.
On Aug 16, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Squy
Seems to be all better now.
On Aug 16, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
The open-mpi.org SVN server is somewhat sick at the moment. You may
not be able to do any SVN activity right now (if you have to ctrl-c an
SVN command because it's hung, be sure to run "svn cleanup" to clean
out all
The open-mpi.org SVN server is somewhat sick at the moment. You may
not be able to do any SVN activity right now (if you have to ctrl-c an
SVN command because it's hung, be sure to run "svn cleanup" to clean
out all local locks, etc.).
The sysadmins are working on it; I'll let you know when i
Hello Gleb,
After thinking about this a bit more - I agree w/ your approach. We're
going to look at moving the cache/mru list into each mpool, and maintaining
the registrations on a per btl basis. This should actually clean up
a lot of code.
We're working on an approach to this now, that I think
Processor affinity is now implemented. You must ask for it via the MCA
param "mpi_paffinity_alone". If this parameter is set to a nonzero
value, OMPI will assume that its job is alone on the nodes that it is
running on, and, if you have not oversubscribed the node, will bind MPI
processes to
Back from training and trying to test this but now OMPI doesn't compile
at all:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../include
-I../../../../include -I../../../.. -I../../../..
-I../../../../include -I../../../../opal -I../../../../orte
-I../../../../ompi -g -Wall -Wundef -Wno-long-long -
Hello,
Why libibcm.so is now required to build openib module?
--
Gleb.
Hi all -
It's been a week or so since I horribly broke configure, so I thought
it was time for another stab at it. This time, the motivation was
the high resolution timers. The timers are different on pretty much
every platform, and have some weird intersections (for example, on
all IA6
12 matches
Mail list logo
