Hi Jeff, Hi all,
The build system, at least, those things I've discovered, is very good,
isolating every part of the subsystems (BTL, OPAL, and so on)... Perhaps an
experience with autoconf and automake before this project make me fell
comfortable with it.
Some information that I'm looking for is
On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Craig Rasmussen wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:45:55PM CET:
The CCA people seemed to be worried that there was a long dead time
between releases and were wondering if they should give up on
autoconf
and move to something else (cmake). I
#@$%@#$%@#$%
I can't believe I left that junk in there. Mea culpa. Will fix
immediately.
:-(
On Jan 5, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Tim S. Woodall wrote:
Yo Jeff,
jsquy...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
Author: jsquyres
Date: 2006-01-04 17:29:09 -0500 (Wed, 04 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 8643
Modified:
trun
Yo Jeff,
jsquy...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
Author: jsquyres
Date: 2006-01-04 17:29:09 -0500 (Wed, 04 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 8643
Modified:
trunk/orte/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp.c
Log:
Avoid a false positive in bcheck
Modified: trunk/orte/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp.c
==
* Craig Rasmussen wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:45:55PM CET:
>
> The CCA people seemed to be worried that there was a long dead time
> between releases and were wondering if they should give up on autoconf
> and move to something else (cmake). I love (to hate) autoconf and was
> hoping that it
