Ralph Castain :
> There has been a lot of discussion about IPv6 in Open MPI and
> OpenRTE recently. My comments here relate solely to OpenRTE and are
> intended to help provide some clarity to the discussion.
Thank you very much for your helpful clarifications. We are currently
collecting so
Bogdan Costescu :
>The question is then what to do about the names given in the
>machinefile ? Should they just be passed to the rsh/ssh client hoping
>that they would work ? Should there be an option for resolving the
Just passing the contents of the machinefile is the way the current code
wor
There has been a lot of discussion about IPv6 in Open MPI and OpenRTE
recently. My comments here relate solely to OpenRTE and are intended to
help provide some clarity to the discussion.
OpenRTE communications are done via the Runtime Messaging Library (RML)
API. The RML is really a strategy l
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Christian Kauhaus wrote:
1. Put IPv[46] addresses into the machinefile. Since they are
protocol-specific, both rsh/ssh uses them just the way they are.
Yes, this would work. The machinefile could come from the user or from
a batch/queueing system, but this should signify
