Re: [OMPI devel] Stack trace printing

2006-08-30 Thread Brian Barrett
Yes. It's always the trampoline, the signal handler, and the stack trace printer. Brian On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 17:37 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: > As long as it's always 3 function calls -- do we know that it will be? > > > On 8/30/06 5:32 PM, "Brian Barrett" wrote: > > > Hi all- > > > > A q

Re: [OMPI devel] Stack trace printing

2006-08-30 Thread Jeff Squyres
As long as it's always 3 function calls -- do we know that it will be? On 8/30/06 5:32 PM, "Brian Barrett" wrote: > Hi all- > > A question about stack tracing. Currently, we have it setup so that, > say, a segfault results in: > > [0]func:/u/jjhursey/local/odin/ompi/devel/lib/libopal.so.0(op

[OMPI devel] Stack trace printing

2006-08-30 Thread Brian Barrett
Hi all- A question about stack tracing. Currently, we have it setup so that, say, a segfault results in: [0]func:/u/jjhursey/local/odin/ompi/devel/lib/libopal.so.0(opal_backtrace_print+0x2b) [0x2a959166ab] [1] func:/u/jjhursey/local/odin/ompi/devel/lib/libopal.so.0 [0x2a959150bb] [2] func:/lib6

[OMPI devel] Change in snapshot tarball generation

2006-08-30 Thread Jeff Squyres
We have changed how we generate snapshot tarballs (previously called "nightly" tarballs). The old way was that if there had been any commits at all to the SVN repository in the previous 24 hours, we would generate new tarballs for all active OMPI development trees. For example, if there had been