[OMPI devel] InfiniBand timeout errors

Hi, I'm getting the errors below when calling MPI_Alltoallv() as part of a matrix transpose operation. It's 100% repeatable when testing with 16M matrix elements divided between 64 processes on 32 dual core nodes. There are never any errors with fewer processes or elements, including the same 32

Re: [OMPI devel] devel Digest, Vol 801, Issue 1

hi again, >>> i'll probably just continue experimenting on my own for the >>> moment (tracking >>> any updates to the main trunk LSF support) to see if i can figure >>> it out. any >>> advice the best way to get such back support into trunk, if and >>> when if exists >>> / is working? >> >> The

[OMPI devel] MTT OMPI results

The database upgrade this weekend for the Open MPI MTT results went very smoothly. Thank you, IU! The results database is now performing much better than it did before the upgrade. I did a query earlier this morning for the weekend results (which was an all-time high AFAIR: ~330k tests);

[OMPI devel] RML/OOB change heads up

Hey all - Thought I would give you guys a heads up on some code that will be coming into the trunk in the not too distant future (hopefully tomorrow?). The changes revolve around the RML/OOB interface and include: * General TCP cleanup for OPAL / ORTE * Simplifying the OOB by moving

Re: [OMPI devel] Orte update

Sigh - somehow, the fix slid out of that commit. I have now fixed it in r15437. Thanks Ralph On 7/16/07 6:11 AM, "Sven Stork" wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2007 15:35, Ralph H Castain wrote: >> >> On 7/13/07 7:22 AM, "Sven Stork" wrote: >> >>> Hi Ralph, >>> >>>

Re: [OMPI devel] Orte update

On Friday 13 July 2007 15:35, Ralph H Castain wrote: > > On 7/13/07 7:22 AM, "Sven Stork" wrote: > > > Hi Ralph, > > > > On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:53, Ralph H Castain wrote: > >> Yo all > >> > >> I have a fairly significant change coming to the orte part of the code base >

[OMPI devel] Fwd: lsf support / farm use models

hi again, [i'm going to snip out the sections that seem resolved] [also, sorry about mutating the subject last time -- oops.] This sounds fine - you'll find that the bproc pls does the exact same thing. In that case, we use #ifdefs since the APIs are actually different between the versions