Nevermind my message below, things seem to be working for me now. Not
sure what happened.
--td
Terry D. Dontje wrote:
Rainer Keller wrote:
Hi Terry,
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 16:22, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
I thought I would run this by the group before trying to unravel the
code
Rainer Keller wrote:
Hi Terry,
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 16:22, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
I thought I would run this by the group before trying to unravel the
code and figure out how to fix the problem. It looks to me from some
experiementation that when a process matches an unexpected messa
Hi,
I am currently working on an app that is to be run at multiple
clusters simultaneously, each with a private Myri-10G network
(see also my recent mail to the users list, 2007-08-21:
"MX/BTL eager_limit/min_send_size").
Simultaneous use of the MX and TCP BTL used to work fine after a
patch r14
Hi Terry,
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 16:22, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
> I thought I would run this by the group before trying to unravel the
> code and figure out how to fix the problem. It looks to me from some
> experiementation that when a process matches an unexpected message that
> the PERUSE f
