Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: delete mvapi BTL for v1.3

Josh and I are talking off-list with specific regards to his customers before I delete the mvapi btl. -jms Sent from my PDA -Original Message- From: Josh Aune [mailto:lu...@lnxi.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 05:15 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Open MPI Developers

Re: [OMPI devel] small configure cache variable bug

Thanks Ralf. Patch pushed in the trunk (commit 16435). george. On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:36:53PM CEST: * config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY): Rename ompi_cv_cc_fvisibility to

Re: [OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: George will have to answer this -- George? (he's on pseudo-vacation for the next 10 days) No, no, no. It's not pseudo at all :) It's as real as possible, when one still have access to email ... Anyway, I'm working out a way to enjoy every

Re: [OMPI devel] small configure cache variable bug

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:36:53PM CEST: > > * config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY): > Rename ompi_cv_cc_fvisibility to ompi_vc_cc_fvisibility, so > that it will be cached. Of course then I get it wrong myself. I meant to write:

[OMPI devel] small configure cache variable bug

Hello Open MPI Developers, Here's a small patch to fix a misnamed cache variable. The next Autoconf version will issue a warning for typos like these, which is how I found this. Cheers, Ralf * config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY): Rename

Re: [OMPI devel] [RFC] change wrapper compilers from binaries to shell scripts

Sounds perfect. I'll vote for it. Thanks, george. On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote: I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack there

Re: [OMPI devel] [RFC] change wrapper compilers from binaries to shell scripts

On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote: I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack there and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like" friendliness on Windows. As a temporary

Re: [OMPI devel] [RFC] change wrapper compilers from binaries to shell scripts

I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack there and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like" friendliness on Windows. As a temporary solution and until we can figure out how many people use

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: delete mvapi BTL for v1.3

How long will the 1.2 series be maintained? This has been giving some of our customers a bit of heart burn, but it can also be used to help push through the OFED upgrades on the clusters (a good thing). Josh On 10/11/07, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Reminder -- this RFC expires

Re: [OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

On Oct 10, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: George has proposed to bring the DDT over from the trunk to the v1.2 branch before v1.2.5 in order to fix some pending bugs. What does this entail (ie does this affect the pml interface at all)? George will have to answer this -- George?

[OMPI devel] [RFC] change wrapper compilers from binaries to shell scripts

What: Change the mpicc/mpicxx/mpif77/mpif90 from being binaries to being shell scripts Why: Our build environment assumes that wrapper compilers will use the same binary format that the Open MPI libraries do. In cross-compile environment, the MPI wrapper compilers will run on the front-end and

Re: [OMPI devel] collective problems

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:43:44AM +0200, Jeff Squyres wrote: > David -- > > Gleb and I just actively re-looked at this problem yesterday; we > think it's related to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/ > 1015. We previously thought this ticket was a different problem, but > our

Re: [OMPI devel] Create a new component (for btl)

You can always start from scratch using the template in the btl directory ... george. On Oct 11, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Aurelien Bouteiller wrote: The elegant way is to go the way you are going. Basically you need to provide open and close to the mca framework, init and finalize to the btl

Re: [OMPI devel] Create a new component (for btl)

The elegant way is to go the way you are going. Basically you need to provide open and close to the mca framework, init and finalize to the btl framework and populate all the functions defined in btl.h and btl/base/base.h. Copying an already existing btl is the best way not to forget

[OMPI devel] Create a new component (for btl)

Hi, I would like to make my own btl component for shared memory, and use that instead of the sm component. First off I would just copy the current sm component, give it another name and see if I can get that to load instead. Is there an elegant way of adding components, any documentation