I was just looking at the Altix timer code in the OMPI trunk and unless
I am missing something, the fd opened in opal_timer_altix_open() is
never closed. It can be safely closed right after the mmap().
-Paul
--
Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies G
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it
works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmall
Hi Bogdan,
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmalloc2. I have previously tried to remove the MX
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I don't get to that point... I am not even able to use the wrapper
compilers (f.e. mpif90) to obtain an executable to run. The
segmentation fault happens when Open MPI utilities are being run, even
ompi_info.
Ahh, I thought you were getting
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Scott Atchley wrote:
Which version of MX are you using? Are you enabling the MX
registration cache (regcache)?
Can you try two runs, one exporting MX_RCACHE=1 and one exporting
MX_RCACHE=0 to all processes?
I don't get to that point... I am not even able to use the wrappe
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmalloc2. I have previously tried
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:40:45AM -0400, Shipman, Galen M. wrote:
> So this problem goes WAY back..
>
> The problem here is that the PML marks MPI completion just prior to calling
> btl_send and then returns to the user. This wouldn't be a problem if the BTL
> then did something, but in the case
So this problem goes WAY back..
The problem here is that the PML marks MPI completion just prior to calling
btl_send and then returns to the user. This wouldn't be a problem if the BTL
then did something, but in the case of OpenIB this fragment may not actually
be on the wire (the joys of user lev
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
There is in the openib BTL.
The bug #1025 has in one the answers the following phrase:
"It looks like this will affect many threading issues with the
pathscale compiler -- the openib BTL is simply the first place we
tripped it."
which along
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jeff Squyres wrote:
There is in the openib BTL.
The bug #1025 has in one the answers the following phrase:
"It looks like this will affect many threading issues with the
pathscale compiler -- the openib BTL is simply the first place we
tripped it."
which along with th
10 matches
Mail list logo