Re: [OMPI devel] PML cm and heterogeneous support

2007-10-24 Thread Brian Barrett
No, it's because the CM PML was never designed to be used in a heterogeneous environment :). While the MX BTL does support heterogeneous operations (at one point, I believe I even had it working), none of the MTLs have ever been tested in heterogeneous environments and it's known the datat

Re: [OMPI devel] PML cm and heterogeneous support

2007-10-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
George / Patrick / Rich / Christian -- Any idea why that's there? Is that because portals, MX, and PSM all require homogeneous environments? On Oct 18, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Sajjad Tabib wrote: Hi, I am tried to run an MPI program in a heterogeneous environment using the pml cm component.

[OMPI devel] RFC: Add "connect" field to openib BTL INI file

2007-10-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
WHAT: Add a "connect" field to the openib BTL INI file to specify which connect pseudo-component(s) (CPCs) can be used for wireup of a given device. WHY: 2 new CPCs are being written (by different parties); certain devices can only use certain CPCs. WHERE: Mainly in btl_openib_ini.*, but

Re: [OMPI devel] PathScale 3.0 problems with Open MPI 1.2.[34]

2007-10-24 Thread Bogdan Costescu
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Brian Barrett wrote: --without-memory-manager --enable-mca-static=btl-mx,mtl-mx From what I understand from the FAQ, the above --enable-mca-static option would include statically linked MX support in libmpi. But I was building all support in (--enable-static --disable-