Hi Guys,
We have a very large executable written in C++, C, F77 and F90 (and we
use all of these compilers!). Our code compiles and links fine but when
we run it on our cluster (under PBSPro) we get the errors at the bottom
of the email.
I wondered if you guys could shed any light on this? Seems
A quick sanity check.
When setting the cq depth in the openib btl, it checks the calculated
depth against the maxmium cq depth allowed and sets the minimum of those
two. However, I think it is checking the wrong variable. If I
understand correctly, ib_dev_attr.max_cq represents the maximum numbe
This confusion is probably all my fault for taking so long to release
PLPA and get it into OMPI. Sorry about this, guys. :-(
Here's where we are:
- PLPA v1.1 has been released (http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/plpa/)
- I updated the /vendor/plpa branch this morning
- Rather than try to sync
On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
Is this the patch that Sharon was working on? I literally just
created a new branch for bringing in plpa v1.1. Should I do it on
your rank_file branch instead?
No need to.
Yes, it's Sharon's patch,
I made a new branch for Rank Mapping RMAP
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> Sent: ב 25 פברואר 2008 16:52
> To: de...@open-mpi.org
> Cc: Lenny Verkhovsky
> Subject: Re: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r17584
>
> Lenny --
>
> Is this the patch that Sharon was working on? I literally just
> crea
Lenny --
Is this the patch that Sharon was working on? I literally just
created a new branch for bringing in plpa v1.1. Should I do it on
your rank_file branch instead?
On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, lenn...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
Author: lennyve
Date: 2008-02-25 09:46:28 EST (Mon, 25 Feb 200
Be aware that the openib CPCs have changed considerably on the /tmp-
public/openib-cpc2 branch...
I guess we'll need to merge this stuff in when we merge step2b and
openib-cpc2 together. There's been a little discussion of whether to
merge the openib-cpc2 branch down to the step2b branch (a
