Re: [OMPI devel] 3 test failures

2008-03-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
Nope, you're not off-topic at all. This has been a debate among us developers for a few days now... :-) The issue is that these tests are now doing something that assume that OMPI has been installed. We've sent an RFC around to the developers proposing how to fix it (easy solution: just

[OMPI devel] 3 test failures

2008-03-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, I've just stumbled over three testsuite failures on GNU/Linux x86, with an out-of-tree build (mkdir build; cd build; ../ompi_trunk/configure -C). Hope I'm not completely off-topic here... Cheers, Ralf PASS: ompi_bitmap

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: OpenMPI changes

2008-03-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Greg Watson wrote: Looking back through the mailing list, I can only see two references that seem relevant to this. One was titled "Major reduction in ORTE" and does allude to the event model changes. The other "OMPI/ORTE and tools" talks about "alternative methods

[OMPI devel] Open MPI v1.2.6rc2 has been posted

2008-03-06 Thread Tim Mattox
Hi All, The "first" (actually rc2) release candidate of Open MPI v1.2.6 is now up: http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.2/ Please run it through it's paces as best you can. -- Tim Mattox, Ph.D. - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/ tmat...@gmail.com || timat...@open-mpi.org I'm a

[OMPI devel] Fault tolerance

2008-03-06 Thread Ralph Castain
Hello I've been doing some work on fault response within the system, and finally realized something I should probably have seen awhile back. Perhaps I am misunderstanding somewhere, so forgive the ignorance if so. When we designed ORTE some time in the deep, dark past, we had envisioned that

Re: [OMPI devel] Orte cleanup

2008-03-06 Thread Ralph Castain
I believe I have at least helped reduce this with r17761. I added the ability for procs to detect that their "lifeline" connection (either the HNP for unity routed, or their local daemon for tree) has been lost and gracefully abort. Let me know if that helps Ralph On 3/4/08 9:37 PM, "Aurélien

Re: [MTT devel] Weird MTT test names

2008-03-06 Thread Ethan Mallove
You can go ahead and delete those rows. (I believe they are from the ORTE test suite I was working on.) -Ethan On Thu, Mar/06/2008 09:39:16AM, Josh Hursey wrote: > I'm trying to cleanup the test_suite/test_name tables in the database, > removing some test names that are invalid and

[MTT devel] Weird MTT test names

2008-03-06 Thread Josh Hursey
I'm trying to cleanup the test_suite/test_name tables in the database, removing some test names that are invalid and unreferenced. In the process I found a whole series of test_names of the following form: test_suite = trivial test_name = MXIQNeaG8e-ping For this particular one it points

Re: [OMPI devel] orte can't launch process

2008-03-06 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:49:13AM -0500, Tim Prins wrote: > Sorry about that. I removed a field in a structure, then 'svn up' seems > to have added it back, so we were using a field that should not even > exist in a couple places. > > Should be fixed in r17757 Works again. Thanks --

[OMPI devel] orte can't launch process

2008-03-06 Thread Gleb Natapov
Something is broken in the trunk. # mpirun -np 2 -H host1,host2 ./osu_latency -- Some of the requested hosts are not included in the current allocation. The requested hosts were specified with --host as: host1,host2 Please