Thanks a lot, George.
I didn't get this message this afternoon, sorry.
Shiqing
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:48:03 -0400
George Bosilca wrote:
That's gcc being really mean !!! There was a double ; at
the end of the line, and apparently the second one is
interpreted as code ... Commit r18090 shou
Thanks George!
On 4/7/08 8:48 AM, "George Bosilca" wrote:
> That's gcc being really mean !!! There was a double ; at the end of
> the line, and apparently the second one is interpreted as code ...
> Commit r18090 should fix the problem.
>
>george.
>
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Ralph H
That's gcc being really mean !!! There was a double ; at the end of
the line, and apparently the second one is interpreted as code ...
Commit r18090 should fix the problem.
george.
On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Ralph H Castain wrote:
Hello
We have a problem this morning on the trunk - rec
Hello
We have a problem this morning on the trunk - recent commits r18084-7
involving the ompi/include/ompi/memchecker.h file contain arithmetic
involving a void* pointer and other problems:
../../../../ompi/include/ompi/memchecker.h: In function
'memchecker_convertor_call':
../../../../ompi/incl
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:54:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/7/08 7:45 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:28:07AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> >>> Also can you explain how
> >>> allgather is implemented in orte (sorry if you already explained this on
On 4/7/08 7:45 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:28:07AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>>> Also can you explain how
>>> allgather is implemented in orte (sorry if you already explained this once
>>> and I missed it).
>>
>> The default method is for each proc to send its m
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:28:07AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> > Also can you explain how
> > allgather is implemented in orte (sorry if you already explained this once
> > and I missed it).
>
> The default method is for each proc to send its modex data to its local
> daemon. The local daemon
On 4/7/08 7:15 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:07:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/7/08 7:04 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
With compression "on", you will get output telling
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:07:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/7/08 7:04 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> >> With compression "on", you will get output telling you the original size of
> >> the message and its com
On 4/7/08 7:04 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>> With compression "on", you will get output telling you the original size of
>> the message and its compressed size so you can see what was done.
>>
> I see this output:
> uncompresse
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> With compression "on", you will get output telling you the original size of
> the message and its compressed size so you can see what was done.
>
I see this output:
uncompressed allgather msg orig size 67521 compressed size 4162.
11 matches
Mail list logo
