Is there a RFC telling us when we might expect this?
On May 9, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
So when this stuff hits the trunk,
I do have some questions about this.
1) If I correctly understood, we need the orte_output and
orte_show_help in order to be able to make a difference between the
application stdout/stderr and the MPI library ones ? Who is applying
the filter ? The local daemon or the HNP ? How do we make s
Per the teleconf this week, Ralph and I worked up two new features
that we're nearly ready to put back in the trunk:
1. IBM+LANL needed a way to XML-ize all output that comes out of OMPI
so that 3rd party tools can parse and use it intelligently (e.g., the
PTP debugger can now distinguish b
Not quite, Josh - I fixed it in our branch. Will send you a revised patch
that does the job off-list for your review.
Thanks
Ralph
On 5/9/08 9:35 AM, "Josh Hursey" wrote:
> Ok I think I understand the problem a bit better now. I attached a
> patch that should fix this, but I want you to check
Ok I think I understand the problem a bit better now. I attached a
patch that should fix this, but I want you to check it out before I
commit just to make sure.
If you specify '-mca filter xml' on the command line then only the
'xml' component should be opened by mca_base_open. The problem
Sure - take a look at the hg repository Jeff and I are working on:
http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/rhc/channel
Te opal/mca/filter framework illustrates the problem. I have one component
in there right now, with a default module defined in the base. That
component must only be selected if
Ralph,
Can you give me an example of a component that I can look at? It will
allow me to test the fix before committing, and to better understand
the problem.
-- Josh
On May 9, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I just hit a problem with this logic - should be a minor change.
We ha
I just hit a problem with this logic - should be a minor change.
We have several frameworks where we have components that are only allowed be
selected if the user specifically requests them by stating -mca foo bar.
Because it is possible for there to be no other components that want to be
selected
Thank you very much George. I'll check this today.
Caciano
2008/5/8 George Bosilca :
> Caciano,
>
> It's a little bit more complex than that. In fact you should never set the
> req_complete flag to true yourself. Instead you should use
> ompi_request_complete (defined in ompi/request/request.h)
On May 9, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Mukesh K Srivastava wrote:
What is the tentatives release dates for OpenMPI-v1.3.1?
Please don't CC both mailing lists on future replies to this thread;
one or the other would be fine; thanks!
Brad Benton and George Bosilca are the release managers for the v1.
Well, history would indicate that 1.3.1 will be released about 1 week after
we release 1.3.0... ;-)
The release date for 1.3.0 remains uncertain see the wiki for the last
guess (currently July).
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/milestone/Open%20MPI%201.3
On 5/8/08 10:58 PM, "Mukesh K Srivas
On May 8, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Mukesh K Srivastava wrote:
The OMPI community should think to come with OpenMPI Internals
document. Probably having an Internal document will certainly help
developers of OpenMPI.
Yes, it will. It's something we've talked about many times, but it
has unfortuna
Hi.
What is the tentatives release dates for OpenMPI-v1.3.1?
Any idea.
BR
13 matches
Mail list logo
