On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Brian states
This will allow users to turn ptmalloc2 support on/off at application
link time instead of MPI compile time.
Where I assume "MPI compile time" means when the MPI *implementation* is
compiled.
Correct.
So what about LD_PRELOAD? Can
Hello,
perusing the OMPI source tree a bit more, I stumbled over a couple of
things:
1) This is from test/Makefile.am:
--- snip ---
# This should be libsupport.a, not libsupport.la. Automake doesn't
# support check_LTLIBRARIES, as technically you have to install a
# shared library before you ca
On 22:33 Wed 04 Jun , Mukesh K Srivastava wrote:
> I am aware that GCC(v-4.2.4) supports OpenMP, so suggested if OMPI could be
> supported too with GCC releases?
Are you 100% sure about what an MPI implementation is?
> There is no confusion please.
There is confusion thank you very much ind
Brian states
This will
allow users to turn ptmalloc2 support on/off at application link time
instead of MPI compile time.
Where I assume "MPI compile time" means when the MPI *implementation* is
compiled.
So what about LD_PRELOAD? Can the user defer the decision to use
ptmalloc until app
Sounds good to me. Thanks Brian!
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
Hi all -
Sorry this is so late, but it took a couple of iterations with a
couple of
people to get right from a technology standpoint. All mistakes in
this
proposal are my fault.
What: Fix the ptmallo
Just to clarify -- are you saying that the function signature for
PVFS_sys_create() has changed over time and that in some versions it
takes 6 parameters, and in other versions it takes 7 parameters? (I
know nothing about PVFS)
Thanks!
On May 30, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Joseph Bane wrote:
H
Hi
I am aware that GCC(v-4.2.4) supports OpenMP, so suggested if OMPI could be
supported too with GCC releases?
There is no confusion please.
BR
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:30 PM, wrote:
> Send devel mailing list submissions to
>de...@open-mpi.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:53:25PM +0530, Mukesh K Srivastava wrote:
>Hi OMPI Community.
>
>
>Is there any thought process to extend GCC support to OpenMPI or
>implementation of OpenMPI specification in GCC for C, C++ & Fortran and
>making it generally available for platforms which supports POSIX.
Hi OMPI Community.
Is there any thought process to extend GCC support to OpenMPI or
implementation of OpenMPI specification in GCC for C, C++ & Fortran and
making it generally available for platforms which supports POSIX.
Can GCC community think extending a support library for OpenMPI in it's
re
Last conf. call Jeff mentioned that he see some collectives failures.
In my MTT testing I also see that Pallas collectives failed -
http://www.open-mpi.org/mtt/index.php?do_redir=682
Alltoall
#
# Benchmarking Alltoall
# #processe
Hello Ralph,
* Ralph Castain wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:59:07PM CEST:
> Very interesting. Don't know if it's the same problem, but I noted an issue
> quite a while ago where make -jN all/install would fail when traversing
> opal. I built a workaround that was just a script that does make all
11 matches
Mail list logo
