Re: [OMPI devel] Fortran 90 Interface

2009-01-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:17 AM, David Robertson wrote: I have attached the requested info. I included the sources to the test program(s). I have left the copies of the .mod files. It should be mentioned that I did not write this code. It was written by the developer of the ROMS ocean model, He

Re: [OMPI devel] [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#512616: [openmpi] missing symbols?

2009-01-22 Thread Manuel Prinz
Sorry for that, the message was supposed to be a private message to Dirk. I did not notice (or expect) you override Reply-To. Best regards Manuel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: [OMPI devel] [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#512616: [openmpi] missing symbols?

2009-01-22 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 15:12 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > On 22 January 2009 at 15:23, Jeff Squyres wrote: > | FWIW, "drop in replacement" in this context means recompile and > | relink. We did not provide binary compatibility between the 1.2 > | series and the 1.3 series. Das k

Re: [OMPI devel] [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#512616: [openmpi] missing symbols?

2009-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 22 January 2009 at 15:23, Jeff Squyres wrote: | (note that Chrisophe is not subscribed to devel, so if he replies, we | won't see it -- sorry; spammers force this kind of policy on us :-( ) (Yes, I also own a few mailing lists for the R Project and use the same policy. He is CC'ed though.)

Re: [OMPI devel] [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#512616: [openmpi] missing symbols?

2009-01-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
(note that Chrisophe is not subscribed to devel, so if he replies, we won't see it -- sorry; spammers force this kind of policy on us :-( ) On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: This bug report just came in against the new Open MPI 1.3 release which we built the same way as

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm Latency

2009-01-22 Thread Richard Graham
Nothing wrong with worrying about ping-pong, this is the first thing people look at. The question about the unexpected queue was to check and see if proper MPI matching is done. If there is matching entry in the unexpected queue, this is the one that is the correct match from the MPI matching rul

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm Latency

2009-01-22 Thread Eugene Loh
Richard Graham wrote: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm Latency In the recvi function, do you first try to match off the unexpected list before you try and match data in the fifo’s? Within the proposed approach, a variety of things are possible. Within the specific code I've put back so far, I

Re: [OMPI devel] Still troubles with 1.3 and MX

2009-01-22 Thread Scott Atchley
On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote: I'm still having some troubles using the newly released 1.3 with Myricom's MX. I've meant to send a message earlier, but the release candidates went so fast that I didn't have time to catch up and test. General details: Nodes with

Re: [OMPI devel] bug in odls_base_default_fns.c

2009-01-22 Thread Ralph Castain
My bad - forgot to change the inequality to equality when Jeff and I revised the default action. Fixed in r20319 On Jan 22, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Thomas Ropars wrote: Hi, I don't manage to run any application with r20318 of the trunk :( I always get the following message: [[24867,0],0] ORTE_ERR

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm Latency

2009-01-22 Thread Richard Graham
BTW, In the recvi function, do you first try to match off the unexpected list before you try and match data in the fifo¹s ? Rich On 1/21/09 8:00 PM, "Eugene Loh" wrote: > Ron Brightwell wrote: >> >>> >>> If you poll only the queue that correspond to a posted receive, you only >>> optim

[OMPI devel] bug in odls_base_default_fns.c

2009-01-22 Thread Thomas Ropars
Hi, I don't manage to run any application with r20318 of the trunk :( I always get the following message: [[24867,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Value out of bounds in file base/odls_base_default_fns.c at line 1223 It seems that the modification of odls_base_default_fns.c in r20312 introduces some pro

[OMPI devel] Still troubles with 1.3 and MX

2009-01-22 Thread Bogdan Costescu
Hi! I'm still having some troubles using the newly released 1.3 with Myricom's MX. I've meant to send a message earlier, but the release candidates went so fast that I didn't have time to catch up and test. General details: Nodes with dual CPU, dual core Opteron 2220, 8 GB RAM

Re: [OMPI devel] Fortran 90 Interface

2009-01-22 Thread David Robertson
Hello Jeff, My mailing list settings were digest so I apologize if this does not get filed under the right thread. I have attached the requested info. I included the sources to the test program(s). I have left the copies of the .mod files. It should be mentioned that I did not write this cod

Re: [OMPI devel] [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#512616: [openmpi] missing symbols?

2009-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Dear Open MPI developers, This bug report just came in against the new Open MPI 1.3 release which we built the same way as 1.2.*. Christophe, Sorry about that. And yes, it should be a drop-in replacement. You can revert back to 1.2.8 from testing for now. If you have a small self-contained

Re: [OMPI devel] VT problems on Debian

2009-01-22 Thread Matthias Jurenz
A workaround for this problem would be to change the selected timer after configure in 'ompi/contrib/vt/vt/config.h'. To do this, just replace the line #define TIMER TIMER_CYCLE_COUNTER by #define TIMER TIMER_GETTIMEOFDAY I agree with Paul - the correct solution would be to choose