I recently spent several days attempting to track down a bug in the
trunk, finally finding that the root cause was linked to a rather
strange behavior of the opal_value_array class.
If you call opal_value_array_get_item and request an index that is
beyond that of the current size of the arr
(Probably this message only for George, but I'll toss it out to the
alias/archive.)
I have a question about the sm sendi() function. What should happen if
the sendi() function attempts to write to the FIFO, but the FIFO is full?
Currently, it appears that the sendi() function returns an erro
No Worries. Thanks for the reply!
Wayne
Brian W. Barrett wrote:
Hi Wayne -
Sorry for the delay. I'm the author of that code, and am currently
trying to finish my dissertation, so I've been a bit behind.
Anyway, at present, the compiler_args field only works on a single
token. So you can'
Please beat up on 1.3.1rc1 before we let it out into the wild to see
if there are any remaining issues that need to be fixed before 1.3.2:
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.3/
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
George Bosilca wrote:
Here is another way to write the code without having to pay the
expensive initialization of sendreq.
first_time = 0;
for ( btl = ... ) {
if ( SUCCESS == sendi() ) return SUCCESS;
if( 0 == first_time++) set_up_expensive_send_request(&sendreq);
i
Hi Wayne -
Sorry for the delay. I'm the author of that code, and am currently trying
to finish my dissertation, so I've been a bit behind.
Anyway, at present, the compiler_args field only works on a single token.
So you can't have something looking for -tp p7. I thought about how to do
thi
Here is another way to write the code without having to pay the
expensive initialization of sendreq.
first_time = 0;
for ( btl = ... ) {
if ( SUCCESS == sendi() ) return SUCCESS;
if( 0 == first_time++) set_up_expensive_send_request(&sendreq);
if ( SUCCESS == send(&sendreq)
I searched for similar problems reported to the list and have not found any.
(only related to icc compiler found, which is unrelevant)
What discussed problems you referencing to?
regards
Mike
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Could this pertain to the other itanium compil
