Re: [OMPI devel] opal_util_register_stackhandlers()

2009-03-19 Thread Jeff Squyres
Thanks for the bug report! I've just changed the behavior to emit a warning and *not* intercept a signal if the old signal action is neither SIG_DFL nor SIG_IGN. The opal_signal MCA parameter can be set to determine which signals you want to intercept; it defaults to the integer values of

[OMPI devel] Fwd: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r20759

2009-03-19 Thread Jeff Squyres
There was a glitch in the SVN server this evening; you can tell that this r number is far lower than it should be. IU is fixing it right now. This commit will occur again with a new, higher SVN r number shortly... Begin forwarded message: From: Date: March 19, 2009 8:41:21 PM EDT To:

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Final cleanup of included headers

2009-03-19 Thread Rainer Keller
Hi Ralph, On Wednesday 18 March 2009 09:00:36 am Ralph Castain wrote: > Could we hold off on this until after 1.3.2 is out the door and has a > couple of days to stabilize? All these header file changes are making > it more difficult to cleanly apply patches to the 1.3 branch. Hmm, sure, we can hol

[OMPI devel] opal_util_register_stackhandlers()

2009-03-19 Thread Kees Verstoep
Hi, Currently, opal_util_register_stackhandlers() in opal/util/stacktrace.c calls sigaction() with a third NULL argument, meaning you don't look at possibly previously installed signal handlers, and always override them with print_stackframe(). But there are actually realistic scenarios where an

[OMPI devel] Open MPI v1.3.1 released

2009-03-19 Thread Ralph Castain
The Open MPI Team, representing a consortium of research, academic, and industry partners, is pleased to announce the release of Open MPI version 1.3.1. This release is mainly a bug fix release over the v1.3.0 release, but there are few new features. We strongly recommend that all users upgrade t

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.3.1rc5

2009-03-19 Thread Brad Benton
Things look good from the IBM side as well. So, RM-approved for release. --brad ompi 1.3 co-release manager On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Looks good to cisco. Ship it. > > I'm still seeing a very low incidence of the sm segv during startup (.01% > -- 23 tests out of

[OMPI devel] 1.3.1rc5

2009-03-19 Thread Jeff Squyres
Looks good to cisco. Ship it. I'm still seeing a very low incidence of the sm segv during startup (. 01% -- 23 tests out of ~160k), so let's ship 1.3.1 and roll in Eugene's new sm code for 1.3.2. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems