Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Open MPI developers, * Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:17:20PM CEST: I think your specific example of public posting of the debug or verbose output might be a valid concern, but perhaps not exactly in the way you've stated it. The act of "dis

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ralph, * Ralph Castain wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 05:09:01PM CEST: > Just to be clear, Ralf - I'm not advocating that we change build > systems. I agree it has been a good relationship, and your participation > has been welcome and extremely helpful. Understood; and thanks! > My poin

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Ralph Castain
Just to be clear, Ralf - I'm not advocating that we change build systems. I agree it has been a good relationship, and your participation has been welcome and extremely helpful. My point was only that the GPL continues to evolve and seems to be growing more aggressive in its "viral" clauses

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI Message Communication over TCP/IP

2009-04-25 Thread Timothy Hayes
I uploaded it to http://www.hotshare.net/file/131218-829472246c.html I'm not sure if it's any good or even if it's 100% accurate; but if someone gets any use out of it, that would be good. Tim 2009/4/17 Jeff Squyres > On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Timothy Hayes wrote: > > From what I understand

[OMPI devel] Open MPI mirrors list

2009-04-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
We just added a mirror web site in Israel. That one was fun because they requested to have their web tagline be in Hebrew. Fun fact: with this addition, Open MPI now has 14 mirror web sites around the world. http://www.open-mpi.org/community/mirrors/ Interested in becoming an Open MPI

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:27:24PM CEST: > We OMPI developers ask people to send the stdout/stderr of configure and > their config.log to us to help figure out problems > (http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/). As I understand your > explanations, this is still

[OMPI devel] MTT usage

2009-04-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
OMPI testing organizations: *** This is an end-of-life announcement for the "ompi-core-testers" MTT SVN branch. This branch will be deleted on 25 May, 2009. *** Also note that new development will soon be occurring on the MTT SVN trunk such that it may become unstable at times. We encoura

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Apr 25, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: 1) While developing your build system, you might have some problem which is Autoconf-related. Autoconf developers ask you to provide output from, say, autoconf --verbose and now, since you are going to publish it on a mailing list such as

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: RFC: proposed GPLv3 license exception draft

2009-04-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Open MPI developers, * Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:17:20PM CEST: > I think your specific example of public posting of the debug or verbose > output might be a valid concern, but perhaps not exactly in the way > you've stated it. The act of "distributing" the debug/v