[OMPI devel] Shared library versioning

2009-07-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
We have talked many times about doing proper versioning for OMPI's .so libraries (e.g., libmpi.so -- *not* our component DSOs). After reading up on the Libtool recommendations on how to do this, I have added a the relevant stuff to the relevant Makefile.am's, and also added a small conveni

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: meaning of "btl_XXX_eager_limit"

2009-07-23 Thread George Bosilca
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:06 , Brian W. Barrett wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote: There are two solutions I can think of. Which should we do? a. Pass the (max?) PML header size down into the BTL during initialization such that the the btl_XXX_eager_limit can represent the max MPI

Re: [OMPI devel] rankfile syntax

2009-07-23 Thread Ralph Castain
Found it - a simple "<=" instead of "<". Test compiling now - should be in trunk shortly. Thanks, oh test pilot! On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Eugene Loh wrote: Oh ye gods of rankfiles: I have a node that has two sockets, each with four cores. If I use a rankfile, I can bind to a specific

Re: [OMPI devel] rankfile syntax

2009-07-23 Thread Ralph Castain
oopsdefinitely looks like a bug to me! I gather you only have 4 cores on that node? I'll take a look at it. I assume this is on the trunk? On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Eugene Loh wrote: Oh ye gods of rankfiles: I have a node that has two sockets, each with four cores. If I use a ra

[OMPI devel] rankfile syntax

2009-07-23 Thread Eugene Loh
Oh ye gods of rankfiles: I have a node that has two sockets, each with four cores. If I use a rankfile, I can bind to a specific core, a specific range of cores, or a specific core or range of cores of a specific socket. I'm having trouble binding to all cores of a specific socket. It's loo

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: meaning of "btl_XXX_eager_limit"

2009-07-23 Thread Brian W. Barrett
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote: There are two solutions I can think of. Which should we do? a. Pass the (max?) PML header size down into the BTL during initialization such that the the btl_XXX_eager_limit can represent the max MPI data payload size (i.e., the BTL can siz

Re: [OMPI devel] BTL receive callback

2009-07-23 Thread Sebastian Rinke
I am curious if you are indeed using a new interconnect (new hardware and protocol) or if it is requirements of the 3D-torus network that are not addressed by the openib btl that are driving the need for a new btl? It is the first one. Sebastian. On 07/21/09 11:55, Sebastian Rinke wrot

[OMPI devel] RFC: meaning of "btl_XXX_eager_limit"

2009-07-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
WHAT: a) Clarify the actual max MPI payload size for eager messages (i.e., the exact meaning of btl_XXX_eager_limit), and b) allow network administrators to shape network traffic by publishing actual BTL max wire fragment sizes (i.e., MPI max payload size + max PML header s