Should they each mail you about MPI_COMPLEX first, too?
;-)
On Aug 3, 2009, at 1:35 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Not before I get an email from every developer in the Open MPI
project !!!
george.
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:31 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
This looks icky.
George -- can you please fix
Hi all,
I've just recently joined because I, too, am working on a (possible) OpenMPI
component. The basics are: A Topology and Weight Evolving Artificial Neural
Network (TWEANN) that learns to configure point-to-point comm. on ob1
fabrics in various compute clusters given a context of existing s
Not before I get an email from every developer in the Open MPI
project !!!
george.
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:31 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
This looks icky.
George -- can you please fix?
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
The following lines were entered into two files
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Aug 3, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
I have recently started working on OpenMPI, and part of my job consists in
adding a new module to OpenMPI.
Cool. What are you adding?
A collective component to support some Bull specific hardware.
Sy
This looks icky.
George -- can you please fix?
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
The following lines were entered into two files by r21739:
ompi/mca/pml/base/pml_base_request.c:
ompi_free_list_t mca_pml_base_send_requests = {0};
ompi_free_list_t mca_pml_base_recv_
On Aug 3, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
I have recently started working on OpenMPI, and part of my job
consists in adding a new module to OpenMPI.
Cool. What are you adding?
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the people who have
been involved in writing https://svn.o
I have not, but there should be no difference. The failover code only
gets triggered when an error happens. Otherwise, there are no
differences in the code paths while everything is functioning normally.
Sounds good. I still did not have time to review the code. I will try to
do it during t
I have not, but there should be no difference. The failover code only
gets triggered when an error happens. Otherwise, there are no
differences in the code paths while everything is functioning normally.
Rolf
On 08/03/09 11:14, Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote:
Rolf,
Did you compare latency/bw fo
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Ralph Castain wrote:
Perhaps a bigger question needs to be addressed - namely, does the ob1 code
need to be refactored?
Having been involved a little in the early discussion with bull when we
debated over where to put this, I know the primary concern was that the code
not
Rolf,
Did you compare latency/bw for failover-enabled code VS trunk ?
Pasha.
Rolf Vandevaart wrote:
Hi folks:
As some of you know, I have also been looking into implementing
failover as well. I took a different approach as I am solving the
problem within the openib BTL itself. This of cour
Hi folks:
As some of you know, I have also been looking into implementing failover
as well. I took a different approach as I am solving the problem within
the openib BTL itself. This of course means that this only works for
failing from one openib BTL to another but that was our area of
int
FYI.
Begin forwarded message:
From: DongInn Kim
Date: August 2, 2009 11:17:17 PM EDT
Subject: Upgrading subversion on sourcehaven
Hi,
I have tried to upgrade subversion-1.4.2 to 1.5.5 on sourcehaven and
this time, there is no problem with the SourceHaven web application.
This upgrade did
Hi list,
I'll try to answer to the main concerns so far.
We chose to work on ob1 for mainly 2 reasons:
- we focused first on fixing dr but were quite disappointed by its
performance in comparison with ob1. Then, we oriented our work on ob1 to
provide failover while keeping good performance.
Hello,
I'm currently looking at the carto framework and the way it is used by
the openib btl. Looking at the code, I found this :
1963if(min_distance < 0 || min_distance < distance)
1964min_distance = distance;
at ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_component.c
in the function:
1
Hello,
I have recently started working on OpenMPI, and part of my job consists
in adding a new module to OpenMPI.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the people who have been
involved in writing
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/devel/CreateComponent as it was
very helpful.
Hi folks
The following lines were entered into two files by r21739:
ompi/mca/pml/base/pml_base_request.c:
ompi_free_list_t mca_pml_base_send_requests = {0};
ompi_free_list_t mca_pml_base_recv_requests = {0};
ompi/mca/bml/bml_base_open.c:
opal_list_t mca_bml_base_components_available = {0};
Un
16 matches
Mail list logo
