In that case, since you ask...it is not a bug - it is definitely a
feature.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
mpirun -V
mpirun (Open MPI) 1.4a1-1
Ralph Castain wrote:
Sigh - you really need to remember to tell us what version you're
talking about.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:39
mpirun -V
mpirun (Open MPI) 1.4a1-1
Ralph Castain wrote:
Sigh - you really need to remember to tell us what version you're
talking about.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
I assume this is a bug?
% mpirun -np 2 -slot-list 1,3 hostname
[saem9:10337] [[455,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG:
Sigh - you really need to remember to tell us what version you're
talking about.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
I assume this is a bug?
% mpirun -np 2 -slot-list 1,3 hostname
[saem9:10337] [[455,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file base/
odls_base_default_fns.c at line
I assume this is a bug?
% mpirun -np 2 -slot-list 1,3 hostname
[saem9:10337] [[455,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
base/odls_base_default_fns.c at line 875
[saem9:10337] *** Process received signal ***
[saem9:10337] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[saem9:10337] Signal code: Address no
Hi Jeff,
Attached is an updated patch, which moves the loop label before
opal_atomic_mb as is done in req_test.c.
Cheers,
Shaun
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Shaun Jackman wrote:
Two questions. Should the loop label recheck_request_status come
before or after the call to
Thanks for the patch. A few comments:
--- a/ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_endpoint.h Mon Aug 31 00:00:16
2009 -0700
+++ b/ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_endpoint.h Thu Sep 17 18:23:58
2009 +0300
@@ -246,6 +246,12 @@
/** Whether we've send out CTS to the peer or not (only used in
