Lisandro,
This code is not correct from the MPI standard perspective. The reason is
independent of the datatype or count, it is solely related to the fact that the
MPI_Reduce cannot accept a sendbuf equal to the recvbuf (or one has to use
MPI_IN_PLACE).
george.
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:02 , L
See the code below. The commented-out combinations for sbuf,rbuf do
work, but the one passing sbuf=rbuf=NULL (i.e, the uncommented one
show below) makes the call fail with MPI_ERR_ARG.
#include
int main( int argc, char ** argv ) {
int ierr;
int sbuf,rbuf;
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
ierr = M
This makes sense to me, unless there are features on the trunk that
absolutely should not be in 1.5. This seems to be a far more manageable way
to handle 1.5 - much less error prone, and much less time consuming.
Rich
On 12/10/09 8:55 AM, "Keller, Rainer H." wrote:
>
> WHAT: Branch (again) f
Hello all,
Indiana University has created more SVN goodness for us: CMRs can be created
and/or amended via magic strings in SVN commit messages.
This will help save a lot of time by:
1.) not manually having to create CMRs
2.) allow the original developer decide what is required
3.) not require
WHAT: Branch (again) for v1.5
WHY: Heavy divergence of trunk vs. v1.5 with few associated CMR's
WHERE: v1.5
WHEN: Tuesday, Dec. 15th 2009 after the teleconference
TIMEOUT: Dec. 15th, 2009
More Details
With v1.4 finally being out in the wild, we'd like to advance on the feature
