I'm checking with slurm the exact "task_per_node" and "cpus_per_task"
behavior, for present and future Slurm version.
Ralph Castain a écrit :
We've gone around on this one a few times too. We finally settled on the
current formula and confirmed it did what the slurm folks expected, so I'm
som
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> > Tracking this down has reminded me of all the reasons why I despise the
> rankfile mapper... :-/
>
> Thanks for all your efforts ! I'm using the rankfile mapper as this is
> the docu
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Tracking this down has reminded me of all the reasons why I despise the
> rankfile mapper... :-/
Thanks for all your efforts ! I'm using the rankfile mapper as this is
the documented (in the FAQ) affinity-related one at least for the
stable
