Once you add a directory under ompi/mca/btl/ and add the relevant files, then
the next time you run "autogen.sh", it should just "find" the component and add
it to the configure and build process. You should not need to edit
ompi/mca/btl/Makefile.am yourself.
Have a look at these wiki pages; t
Wesley,
Thanks for catching that oversight. Below are the MCA parameters that you
should need at the moment:
#
# Use the C/R Process Migration Recovery Supervisor
recos_base_enable=1
# Only use the 'rsh' launcher, other launchers will be supported later
plm=rsh
Josh,
You mentioned some MCA parameters that you would include in the email, but I
don't see those parameters anywhere. Could you please put those in here to
make testing easier for people.
Wesley
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> Yesterday evening George, Thomas and I dis
Yesterday evening George, Thomas and I discussed some of their concerns about
this RFC at the MPI Forum meeting. After the discussion, we seemed to be in
agreement that the RecoS framework is a good idea and the concepts and fixes in
this RFC should move forward with a couple of notes:
- They
Hey Jeff,
as said I'd be in favor of updating.
This would get rid of some of the tests in autogen, speeding up things.
Regards,
Rainer
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 12:07:56 pm Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Brian and I chatted about this in person -- he doesn't have too strong of
> an opinion here.
>
> We
No problem with me. Why don't we then modify this RFC to simply eliminate the
--enable-opal-progress-thread option, and leave the rest as-is so we can enable
the opal thread machinery without enabling MPI thread multiple?
I agree that having an ORTE-level thread makes the most sense, if it is ne
There was way too much information on this thread that I was looking for ;) And
a lot of misunderstandings ...
If we want to allow ORTE to be on his own thread, then we should clearly banish
the progress_thread from this equation. I would prefer ORTE to be as separated
from the rest of the MPI
Brian and I chatted about this in person -- he doesn't have too strong of an
opinion here.
We checked versions shipped in RHEL:
RHEL4: AC 2.59, AM 1.9.2, LT 1.5.6
RHEL5: AC 2.59, AM 1.9.2, LT 1.5.22
Meaning: they're both really ancient.
I personally don't mind forcing developers to have more m
Hi Jeff & All
i want to add a new component in the ompi,
1: i make a dir ~/mca/btl/ht
2:Then,i have made sure some basic functions i need to implement.
such as:
mca_btl_ht_add_procs,
mca_btl_ht_del_procs,
mca_btl_ht_alloc
mca_btl_ht_free
mca_btl_ht_finalize.
3:after these functions,i must compile t
