On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
Hi Ralph,
For now, I think that yes, this is a unique identifier. However,
in my opinion, this could be improved in the future replacing
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote:
#define ORTE_NOTIFIER_DEFINE_EVENT(eventstr, associated_text) {
static int event = -1;
if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(event == -1) {
event = opal_sos_create_new_event(eventstr, associated_text);
}
..
}
This
8th question is as follows:
(8) The result of communication which uses derived datatypes which was
constructed
using MPI_Type_vector,MPI_Type_indexed is incorrect after taking checkpoint.
Framework : datatype
Component : datatype
The source file : ompi/datatype/dt_copy.c
T
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:37 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hi Abhishek
>
>
> I'm confused by the WDC wiki page, specifically the part about the new
> ORTE_NOTIFIER_DEFINE_EVENT macro. Are you saying that I (as the
> developer) have to provide this macro with a unique notifier id?
Hi Ralph,
Actua
