Oliver Geisler wrote:
This is the results of skampi pt2pt, first with shared memory allowed,
second shared memory excluded.
Thanks for the data. The TCP results are not very interesting... they
look reasonable.
The shared-memory data is rather straightforward: results are just
plain ridi
Sorry for replying late. Unfortunately I am not "full time
administrator". And I am going to be a conference next week, so please
be patient with me replying.
On 4/7/2010 6:56 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Oliver Geisler wrote:
>
>> Using netpipe and comparing tcp and mpi communication I get the
>> fol
Ralph Castain wrote:
Okay, just wanted to ensure everyone was working from the same base code.
Terry, Brad: you might want to look this proposed change over.
Something doesn't quite look right to me, but I haven't really walked
through the code to check it.
At first blush I don't really get
FYI -- short Trac outage next Monday.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Kim, DongInn"
> Date: April 9, 2010 2:19:33 PM EDT
> Subject: [all-osl-users] Upgrading trac
>
> The OSL will upgrade trac from 0.11.5 to 0.11.7 on sourcehaven next
> Monday(4/12/2010)?
>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010.
>
Okay, just wanted to ensure everyone was working from the same base code.
Terry, Brad: you might want to look this proposed change over. Something
doesn't quite look right to me, but I haven't really walked through the code to
check it.
On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Nadia
Nadia Derbey wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 08:41 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
Just to check: is this with the latest trunk? Brad and Terry have been making
changes to this section of code, including modifying the PROCESS_IS_BOUND
test...
Well, it was on the v1.5. But I just checked:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 08:41 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Just to check: is this with the latest trunk? Brad and Terry have been making
> changes to this section of code, including modifying the PROCESS_IS_BOUND
> test...
>
>
Well, it was on the v1.5. But I just checked: looks like
1. the ca
Just to check: is this with the latest trunk? Brad and Terry have been making
changes to this section of code, including modifying the PROCESS_IS_BOUND
test...
On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:39 AM, Nadia Derbey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a problem with a test that runs fine on some nodes, and
> fails
Hi,
I am facing a problem with a test that runs fine on some nodes, and
fails on others.
I have a heterogenous cluster, with 3 types of nodes:
1) Single socket , 4 cores
2) 2 sockets, 4cores per socket
3) 2 sockets, 6 cores/socket
I am using:
. salloc to allocate the nodes,
. mpirun binding/ma
