On 10 Apr 2010, at 04:51, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Why is shared-memory performance about four orders of magnitude slower than
> it should be? The processes are communicating via memory that's shared by
> having the processes all mmap the same file into their address spaces. Is it
> possible that
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
Why is shared-memory performance about four orders of magnitude slower than
it should be?
Have there been any process scheduler changes in the newer kernels ?
I'm not sure that they could explain f
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Why is shared-memory performance about four orders of magnitude slower than
> it should be?
Have there been any process scheduler changes in the newer kernels ?
I'm not sure that they could explain four orders of magnitude
differences though...
