Hi folks
I rolled the 1.4.2 release candidate 1 tarball today. It is available on the
web site:
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.4/
There is no rpm version available - just tarballs. Please give it a whirl and
let us know of any problems.
Thanks
Ralph
Yikes! I totally mis-read your email as an inquiry about LAM/MPI. Looking at
it closer, I see that you are asking about Open MPI, but using LAM as a
reference. Sorry about that!
You probably want to look in ompi/proc/proc.h.
On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:23 AM, luyang dong wrote:
> dear teachers
This is the list for Open MPI developers, not LAM/MPI. We ex-LAM/MPI
developers are on this list, but we're not inclined to answer LAM questions on
this list. :-) Heck, we're not inclined to answer LAM questions at all, if we
can avoid it. :-) :-) :-)
Specifically: LAM is pretty dead. We h
dear teachers:
LAM/MPI constructs communication channel via process location identified by
type struct _gps in LAM universe. struct _gps{
int4 gps_node;
int4 gps_pid;
int4 gps_idx;
int4 gps_granks;
}. In order to know of other proces
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I actually went back/forth on that as well - I personally think it might be
> better to just have warn and quiet, with warn being the default. The warning
> could be generated with orte_show_help so the messages would be consolidated
> across
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 01:27 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Nadia Derbey wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:07 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> >> By definition, if you bind to all available cpus in the OS, you are
> >> bound to nothing (i.e., "unbound") as your process
On Apr 13, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Nadia Derbey wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:07 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> By definition, if you bind to all available cpus in the OS, you are
>> bound to nothing (i.e., "unbound") as your process runs on any
>> available cpu.
>>
>>
>> PLPA doesn't care, and I
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:07 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> By definition, if you bind to all available cpus in the OS, you are
> bound to nothing (i.e., "unbound") as your process runs on any
> available cpu.
>
>
> PLPA doesn't care, and I personally don't care. I was just explaining
> why it gene
