Re: [hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers

2010-05-10 Thread Pavan Balaji
Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea. -- Pavan On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote: I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers that don't support C99, would you be willing

[hwloc-devel] Graceful abort for non-C99 compilers

2010-05-10 Thread Pavan Balaji
I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers that don't support C99, would you be willing to gracefully abort during configure instead of failing at make time? https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/changeset/6634 I agree that most compilers today probably support

Re: [OMPI devel] Thread safety levels

2010-05-10 Thread Sylvain Jeaugey
On Mon, 10 May 2010, N.M. Maclaren wrote: As explained by Sylvain, current Open MPI implementation always returns MPI_THREAD_SINGLE as provided thread level if neither --enable-mpi-threads nor --enable-progress-threads was specified at configure (v1.4). That is definitely the correct action.