Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin nehalem servers with Mellanox ConnectX installed

2010-05-14 Thread Ralph Castain
We have had a FAQ on this for a long time...problem is, nobody reads it :-/ Glad you found the problem! On May 14, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > Oskar Enoksson wrote: >> Christopher Samuel wrote: >> >>> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin >>> n

Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin nehalem servers with Mellanox ConnectX installed

2010-05-14 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Oskar Enoksson wrote: Christopher Samuel wrote: Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin nehalem servers with Mellanox ConnectX installed To: de...@open-mpi.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 13/05/10 20:56, Oskar Eno

Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin nehalem servers with Mellanox ConnectX installed

2010-05-14 Thread Oskar Enoksson
Christopher Samuel wrote: > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Very poor performance with btl sm on twin > nehalem servers with Mellanox ConnectX installed > To: de...@open-mpi.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 13/05/10 20:56, Oskar Enoksson wrote: > >

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC 2/2: merge the OPAL SOS development branch into trunk

2010-05-14 Thread Josh Hursey
On May 12, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote: > Updated RFC (w/ discussed changes): > > == > [RFC 2/2] merge the OPAL SOS development branch into trunk > ==