I think your fix looks right.
But I'm getting my head warped trying to understand why you'd want numbers so
low (4, 2, 1) and exactly what our algorithm will re-post for numbers that low,
etc. Why do you want them so low?
On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:10 AM, nadia.derbey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference
Brad found a problem with the hwloc component on ppc64. At first glance, it
looks like a problem in the component and not hwloc itself.
We're investigating. I'll (obviously) delay removing the other components
until we get this straightened out.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corpora
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.5/
Please test!
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> See the code below. As expected, you DO get an error (though the error
> is ERR_INTERN, somewhat not informative). However, if you fist
> create() % destroy a windows, you DO NOT get any error. This is VERY
> strange, right?
It looks like it's
