On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
BTW, are you guys waiting for us to commit that, or do we ever give you guys
SVN commit access?
Nadia is off today. She should commit it tomorrow.
Sylvain
On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
> Why do we want to set this value so low ? Well, just to see if it crashes :-)
That's a good reason! :-)
> More seriously, we're working on lowering the memory usage of the openib BTL,
> which is achieved at most by having only 1 send queue
Hi Jeff,
Why do we want to set this value so low ? Well, just to see if it crashes
:-)
More seriously, we're working on lowering the memory usage of the openib
BTL, which is achieved at most by having only 1 send queue element (at
very large scale, send queues prevail).
This "extreme" conf
Good catch. The patch looks ok for me.
Regards
---
Pavel Shamis (Pasha)
sham...@ornl.gov
On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:10 AM, nadia.derbey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference is the v1.5 branch
>
> If an SRQ has the following settings: S,,4,2,1
>
> 1) setup_qps() sets the following:
> mca_btl_openib_compone
