Re: [OMPI devel] Setting AUTOMAKE_JOBS

2010-09-23 Thread Ralph Castain
I found one major negative to this change - it assumes that my build is being done in exclusion of anything else on my computer. Unfortunately, this is never true. So my laptop hemorrhaged itself into frozen silence, overheated to the point of being burning hot, and had to have its battery yanked

Re: [OMPI devel] Autogen improvements: ready for blast off

2010-09-23 Thread Ethan Mallove
We can build an SVN checkout, but with a tarball we get this: ... Undefined first referenced symbol in file opal_backtrace_print../../../opal/.libs/libopen-pal.so opal_backtrace_buffer ../../../opal/.libs/libope

Re: [OMPI devel] update configury for Autoconf 2.68

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:11:41PM CEST: > On Sep 23, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >> Is the call to AM_SILENT_RULES now moot because it's listed in > >> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE? > > > > Oh, just drop that hunk, that was leftover junk in my tree and isn't > > really

Re: [OMPI devel] update configury for Autoconf 2.68

2010-09-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 23, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> Is the call to AM_SILENT_RULES now moot because it's listed in >> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE? > > Oh, just drop that hunk, that was leftover junk in my tree and isn't > really needed any more; I didn't mean to send it along. Is the silent-rules claus

Re: [OMPI devel] update configury for Autoconf 2.68

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:31:32PM CEST: > One very minor question: I notice you added silent-rules to > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (and bumped the required version, too), but still > left in the call to AM_SILENT_RULES: > > -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign dist-bzip2 subdir-objects

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: make hwloc first-class data

2010-09-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > I unfortunately don't have many cycles to think about this before Oct 1, but > I'm still a little concerned about the portability aspects of having hwloc be > a first class citizen of OMPI - if we support a platform hwloc doesn't, that > s

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: make hwloc first-class data

2010-09-23 Thread George Bosilca
On Sep 22, 2010, at 21:08 , Jeff Squyres wrote: > WHAT: Make hwloc a 1st class item in OMPI > > WHY: At least 2 pieces of new functionality want/need to use the hwloc data > > WHERE: Put it in ompi/hwloc > > WHEN: Some time in the 1.5 series > > TIMEOUT: Tues teleconf, Oct 5 (about 2 weeks fr

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: make hwloc first-class data

2010-09-23 Thread Barrett, Brian W
I unfortunately don't have many cycles to think about this before Oct 1, but I'm still a little concerned about the portability aspects of having hwloc be a first class citizen of OMPI - if we support a platform hwloc doesn't, that seems like it will still cause problems... Brian On Sep 22, 20

Re: [OMPI devel] update configury for Autoconf 2.68

2010-09-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
Excellent -- many thanks Ralf! One very minor question: I notice you added silent-rules to AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (and bumped the required version, too), but still left in the call to AM_SILENT_RULES: -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign dist-bzip2 subdir-objects no-define 1.10 tar-ustar]) +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([f

[OMPI devel] update configury for Autoconf 2.68

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello OpenMPI developers, just-released Autoconf 2.68 contains more stringent checks and warnings about stuff passed to AC_{COMPILE,LINK,RUN}_IFELSE and AC_TRY_* macros. Specifically, it will warn if C or C++ programs are not generated with AC_LANG_SOURCE or AC_LANG_PROGRAM, in order to avoid acci