Re: [OMPI devel] confusion between slot and procs on mca/rmaps

2010-12-01 Thread Ralph Castain
Done in r24126 On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:11 AM, Damien Guinier wrote: > oups > > Ok, you can commit it. All problem is on "procs" word, on source code, > "processes" AND "cores" definition is used. > > > Le 01/12/2010 11:37, Damien Guinier a écrit : >> Ok, you can commit it. All problem is on "pro

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Bring the lastest ROMIO version from MPICH2-1.3 into the trunk

2010-12-01 Thread Pascal Deveze
Hi Jeff, Comments are in the text Jeff Squyres a écrit : On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Pascal Deveze wrote: I have commited all my last changes in bitbucket, including those that follows. I got a checkout, and still have some problems/questions. More below. If you do the IM thing,

Re: [OMPI devel] confusion between slot and procs on mca/rmaps

2010-12-01 Thread Damien Guinier
oups Ok, you can commit it. All problem is on "procs" word, on source code, "processes" AND "cores" definition is used. Le 01/12/2010 11:37, Damien Guinier a écrit : Ok, you can commit it. All problem is on "procs" work, on source code, "processes" AND "cores" definition is used. Thank you

Re: [OMPI devel] confusion between slot and procs on mca/rmaps

2010-12-01 Thread Damien Guinier
Ok, you can commit it. All problem is on "procs" work, on source code, "processes" AND "cores" definition is used. Thank you for your help. Damien Le 01/12/2010 10:47, Ralph Castain a écrit : I just checked and it appears bycore does correctly translate to byslot. So your patch does indeed ap

Re: [OMPI devel] confusion between slot and procs on mca/rmaps

2010-12-01 Thread Ralph Castain
I just checked and it appears bycore does correctly translate to byslot. So your patch does indeed appear to be correct. If you don't mind, I'm going to apply it for you as I'm working on a correction for how we handle oversubscribe flags, and I want to ensure the patch gets included so we compu

Re: [OMPI devel] confusion between slot and procs on mca/rmaps

2010-12-01 Thread Ralph Castain
Afraid I don't speak much slurm any more (thank goodness!). >From your output, It looks like the system is mapping bynode instead of >byslot. IIRC, isn't bycore just supposed to be a pseudonym for byslot? So >perhaps the problem is that "bycore" causes us to set the "bynode" flag by >mistake. D

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 plans

2010-12-01 Thread Ralph Castain
I don't have a real opinion here as the work I'm doing doesn't rely on stable releases. That said, I wanted to clarify something hinted at in earlier comments. I killed the ORTE refresh ticket -not- because I believe it doesn't belong in the 1.5 series, or any other release. I killed it because