On Dec 18 2010, Ken Lloyd wrote:
Yes, this is a hard problem. It is not endemic to OpenMPI, however.
This hints at the distributed memory/process/thread issues either
through the various OSs or alternately external to them in many solution
spaces.
Absolutely. I hope that I never implied an
On Dec 18, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Ken Lloyd wrote:
> In other words, if we were to offer a true "flexible dynamic
> processing" (which I personally would advocate), would they (the
> developers and users) come?
This has pretty much been the problem: so far, they have not. :-\
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy.
Nick Maclaren,
Yes, this is a hard problem. It is not endemic to OpenMPI, however.
This hints at the distributed memory/process/thread issues either
through the various OSs or alternately external to them in many solution
spaces.
Jeff Squyers statement that "flexible dynamic processing is not
On Dec 17 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
It's not an unknown problem -- as George and Ralph were trying to say, it
was a design decision on our part.
Sadly, flexible dynamic processing is not something that many people ask
for. We have invested time in it over the year to get it working and have
