On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it
> to the no-auth way for a reason.
Are you obliquely saying that there's a reason to have no-auth https access?
DongInn and I changed it because we're still havi
Makes sense to me.
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:49 -0700, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it
> to the no-auth way for a reason.
>
> Brian
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> Sent:
Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it
to the no-auth way for a reason.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:24 AM
To: Open Developers
Subject: [OMPI devel] Minor OMPI SVN
