Works for me :-)
On Jul 9, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Leaving out many details, I think the arguments can be summarized as:
>
> 1. Ralph's argument is that per convention of our other 2 layers,
> "_finalize" should unconditionally finalize the layer. Just do it.
> It's also weir
Leaving out many details, I think the arguments can be summarized as:
1. Ralph's argument is that per convention of our other 2 layers,
"_finalize" should unconditionally finalize the layer. Just do it. It's
also weird that opal_finalize() may actually do *nothing* (vs. finalizing at
least al
I'm still getting warnings about OMPI_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_SL not being defined, even
though I see this in my configure output:
checking if can use dynamic SL support... yes
That's why I wanted that macro *always* defined by the m4 (to either 0 or 1) --
not just defining it or not. This is one of th
Sorry for the delayed reply.
I'm guessing that there's some kind of rooted collective operation occurring
during MPI_INIT. Try doing a 1 byte MPI_GATHER to another rank in MCW (e.g.,
to rank 5) and see if the VmSS goes to the same size as MCW rank 0.
On Jul 8, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Eloi Gaudry wr
