I said I didn't have the patience to retest until rc2, but a bit of
scripting has changed that.
It not only gave me the patience to re-test, but to expand my testing to
15 non-linux machines.
I've tested the 1.5.5rc1 tarball on a pile of non-linix systems with 2
fixes in place:
+ Added #incl
I've noticed that on, for instance, FreeBSD I must compile
openmpi-1.5.5rc1 with "gmake" rather than "make".
I didn't see "GNU Make" listed as a build dependency in the README, and
so I wonder if this was known.
The failure mode seen with Berkeley Make in place of GNU Make is
somewhat non-intu
On Dec 16, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Nathan T. Hjelm wrote:
>> Why do the symbols need to be weak? Remember that not all platforms
>> support weak symbols.
>
> I don't know. The way we currently pull MPIR symbols into orterun breaks
> with some configuration. If we don't pull the symbols in then launch
> Why do the symbols need to be weak? Remember that not all platforms
> support weak symbols.
I don't know. The way we currently pull MPIR symbols into orterun breaks
with some configuration. If we don't pull the symbols in then launchmon
can't attach to orterun. Moving the symbols to weak fixes
Why do the symbols need to be weak? Remember that not all platforms support
weak symbols.
The symbols don't need to be in the executable itself, right? It should be
fine for them to be a library (e.g., libopen-rte.so/a).
On Dec 16, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
>
> Yes, this fixe
Setting the error handler to MPI_ERRORS_RETURN is the right solution for
mechanism using the PMPI interface. Hugo is one software layer below the MPI
interface, so the error handler is not affecting his code. However, once he
reacts to an error, he should reset the error (in the status attached
I'm jumping into the middle of this conversation and probably don't have all
the right context, so forgive me if this is a stupid question: did you set
MPI_ERRORS_RETURN on the communicator in question?
On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Hugo Daniel Meyer wrote:
> Hello George and @ll.
>
> Sorry f
Yes, this fixes the issue.
Ashley.
On 15 Dec 2011, at 23:42, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> I have an idea. How about we set those the MPIR variables as weak. Just
> tested it with STAT.
>
> Can you replace orte/tools/orterun/orterun.c with the attached version and
> see if it fixes the issue?
>
> -