Agreed.
Brian
On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> +1 for SJ - much easier to be someplace with a major airport.
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Gutierrez, Samuel K wrote:
>
>> My vote is for San Jose.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> From: devel-b
+1 for SJ - much easier to be someplace with a major airport.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Gutierrez, Samuel K wrote:
> My vote is for San Jose.
>
> Sam
>
>
> From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of
> Josh Hursey [jjhu
Oh this actually does make a lot of sense. The kicker is that Rmpi doesn't
like to use OMPI and really loves to use LAM so I have to use R in batch
mode by running mpirun -np 12 and specify the host file. I have a bad
feeling that this is loading the library 12 times, once for each R
namespace. Whi
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
> Oh how interesting and I hope this helps someone. Following another link, I
> had to use:
>
> ./configure --prefix /usr --enable-shared --enable-static
This makes sense. You were falling victim to the fact that R dlopens libmpi as
a dynami
On Apr 6, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Kawashima wrote:
> I've checked your code in bitbucket. Two types of error are found.
> I've attached the patch.
>
> First one (ignore-tkr) seems to be an error by manual patching.
> Second one (tkr) seems that patch command could not apply my fixes
> because neighbori
Hi Jeff,
I've checked your code in bitbucket. Two types of error are found.
I've attached the patch.
First one (ignore-tkr) seems to be an error by manual patching.
Second one (tkr) seems that patch command could not apply my fixes
because neighboring lines were modified in your code.
Regards,
Have you tried to compile and run a simple MPI program with your
installed Open MPI? If that works then you need to figure out what is
being done by the Makefile when it is "testing if installed package can
be loaded" and try and reproduce the issue manually.
BTW, I normally configure my OMPI
