Re: [OMPI devel] FDR: bad patch? (was: 1.6rc3 is out)

2012-05-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
On May 9, 2012, at 11:33 AM, wrote: > Well, looking at the libverbs sources, it seems that there is a patch for > devinfo (cf below). > > Thus, the correct speeds, according to the libibverbs patch. And, if I > understand well, they must be > multiplied by the coding ratio to get the real lin

Re: [OMPI devel] FDR: bad patch? (was: 1.6rc3 is out)

2012-05-09 Thread Ludovic . Hablot
Well, looking at the libverbs sources, it seems that there is a patch for devinfo (cf below). Thus, the correct speeds, according to the libibverbs patch. And, if I understand well, they must be  multiplied by the coding ratio to get the real link speed. I joined another patch. I don't know if

Re: [OMPI devel] FDR: bad patch? (was: 1.6rc3 is out)

2012-05-09 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 10.20.47 Jeff Squyres wrote: ... > I don't have any QDR or FDR equipment -- what's the typical active_width for > QDR and FDR? > > QDR is 32000, so is that active_speed of 4 and active_width of 4? (8000 * 4 > = 32000)? > > FDR is 56000 (right? Pretty much all IB is 4x to

[OMPI devel] FDR: bad patch? (was: 1.6rc3 is out)

2012-05-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
On May 9, 2012, at 9:52 AM, wrote: > About changeset 26385: ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_component.c > > I might be wrong but I think that the speed we put in > openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth is the speed of one link. It will be multiply > by the number of links (*4, ib_port_attr->active_wi

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Update libevent

2012-05-09 Thread Josh Hursey
Thanks! On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Sure! See attached the original note to the libevent folks > > > Hi folks > > I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not > using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior we are > s

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6rc3 is out

2012-05-09 Thread Ludovic . Hablot
Hi, About changeset 26385: ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_component.c I might be wrong but I think that the speed we put in  openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth is the speed of one link. It will be multiply by the number of links (*4, ib_port_attr->active_width) to obtain the correct speed. Thus,

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Update libevent

2012-05-09 Thread Ralph Castain
Sure! See attached the original note to the libevent folks --- Begin Message --- Hi folks I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior we are seeing that might be a potential bug. I have attached a

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Update libevent

2012-05-09 Thread Josh Hursey
Ralph, Can you point me to the small reproducer for the libevent bug that was fixed? I'm just curious. Thanks, Josh On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > FYI: 2.0.19-stable was released yesterday. I have a Mercurial repo all set to > go: > > https://bitbucket.org/rhc/ompi-libe

[OMPI devel] 1.6rc3 is out

2012-05-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
1.6rc3 represents one trivial change over rc2; it is expected to be the last rc. It's in the usual location: http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.6/ The change is: - Added support for FDR InfiniBand detection -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: